Sam Houston logo

Sam Houston

22-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.9%Sam Houston
47.1%Pittsburgh
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSam Houston -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL151.7
MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -112
Pittsburgh logo

Pittsburgh

13-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSam Houston 76
Projected Total151.7
Projected ScorePittsburgh 75

Team Comparison

56.1MMH Power Index50.5
115.5Offensive Efficiency108.4
105.5Defensive Efficiency110.4
10.0Net Efficiency-2.0
-2.2Strength of Schedule5.5
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9
71.2Tempo65.0
53.2%Effective FG%51.4%
16.6%Turnover Rate17.3%
37.4%Offensive Rebound %33.1%
34.8%Free Throw Rate31.2%
7.1Average Margin-1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–50.5), offensive efficiency (115.5–108.4), defensive efficiency (105.5–110.4), net efficiency (10.0–-2.0).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–-2.2).
Final
Sam Houston logo
Sam Houston
78—110
Pittsburgh logo
Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh by 32 • 72.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Sam HoustonTEAM STATPittsburgh
30-56FG38-65
54.0%FG%58.0%
7-233PT16-31
30.0%3PT%52.0%
11-20FT18-23
55.0%FT%78.0%
24Rebounds36
6Offensive Rebounds12
6Assists23
12Turnovers10
6Steals5
—Blocks1
18Fouls21

Player Box Score

Sam Houston
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cameron HuefnerForward4010-172-64-550100026
Lamar WilkersonG395-152-93-333300015
Erik TaylorG193-52-31-21100009
Kian ScrogginsForward203-30-02-33000008
Dorian FinisterG253-50-20-14020006
Brennen BurnsGuard153-30-00-01100006
Josiah HammonsG222-61-30-00100005
Kalifa SakhoF201-20-01-62000003
Pittsburgh
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ishmael LeggettGuard318-123-44-553010023
Zack AustinForward308-125-92-251000023
Jaland LoweG347-173-91-2311100018
Cameron CorhenF315-70-05-762100015
Brandin CummingsG182-51-25-631000010
Guillermo Diaz GrahamF253-52-40-05220008
Amsal DelalicG123-31-10-04210007
Papa Amadou KanteF71-20-11-12000003
Jorge Diaz GrahamF71-11-10-00100003
Marlon Barnes Jr.F30-00-00-00000000
Amdy NdiayeF20-10-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

72.7Possessions72.7
107.3Offensive Efficiency151.3
151.3Defensive Efficiency107.3
-44.0Net Efficiency44.0
59.8%Effective FG%70.8%
59.5%True Shooting %72.4%
16.8%Turnover Rate13.5%
35.7%Free Throw Rate35.4%
41.1%3-Point Rate47.7%
0.50Assist / Turnover2.30
Game Summary
Pittsburgh won by 32 points. The game played at approximately 72.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.