UC Irvine

23-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

58.6%UC Irvine

41.4%Duquesne

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUC Irvine -1.9

PROJECTED TOTAL151.7

MODEL MONEYLINEUC Irvine -142

Duquesne

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUC Irvine 77

Projected Total151.7

Projected ScoreDuquesne 75

Team Comparison

UC IrvineMetricDuquesne

58.4MMH Power Index50.7

106.9Offensive Efficiency110.6

95.0Defensive Efficiency106.2

11.9Net Efficiency4.4

-1.0Strength of Schedule0.6

10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9

72.3Tempo70.8

50.7%Effective FG%53.4%

17.6%Turnover Rate17.7%

33.1%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

36.5%Free Throw Rate38.2%

8.6Average Margin3.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UC Irvine HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUC Irvine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.4–50.7), defensive efficiency (95.0–106.2), net efficiency (11.9–4.4), recent form (10.0–-5.9).

Duquesne COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.6–106.9), strength of schedule (0.6–-1.0), shooting efficiency (53.4–50.7).

Final

UC Irvine

54—70

Duquesne

Duquesne by 16 • 60.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UC IrvineTEAM STATDuquesne

18-53FG27-55

34.0%FG%49.0%

4-123PT14-25

33.0%3PT%56.0%

14-21FT2-4

67.0%FT%50.0%

38Rebounds33

15Offensive Rebounds7

10Assists18

13Turnovers9

5Steals7

7Blocks5

14Fouls19

Player Box Score

UC Irvine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Myles Che	G	27	3-11	0-3	3-3	2	2	1	0	9
Torian Lee	G	25	2-5	1-2	2-2	1	2	0	0	7
Bent Leuchten	Center	15	2-4	1-1	2-2	3	1	0	1	7
Justin Hohn	Guard	21	2-7	2-4	0-0	1	1	1	0	6
Kyle Evans	F	16	3-5	0-0	0-0	6	2	0	0	6
Devin Tillis	F	22	1-4	0-0	2-2	7	1	1	0	4
Ofure Ujadughele	Guard	15	1-3	0-0	2-2	2	1	1	0	4
Elijah Chol	F	11	1-3	0-0	1-3	0	0	1	5	3
Jurian Dixon	G	22	1-5	0-2	0-2	2	0	0	0	2
Berk Can Akin	Guard	14	1-4	0-0	0-1	4	0	0	1	2
Ben Egbo	G	10	1-2	0-0	0-1	4	0	0	0	2
Tishan Ahir	G	2	0-0	0-0	2-3	0	0	0	0	2

Duquesne

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jahsean Corbett	Guard	36	6-12	3-6	0-1	8	3	1	1	15
Tre Dinkins	G	29	4-7	3-4	2-2	2	4	1	0	13
Cam Crawford	G	27	5-9	3-4	0-0	1	2	2	0	13
David Dixon	F	25	4-6	1-3	0-0	7	2	0	3	9
Kareem Rozier	G	23	3-5	2-3	0-0	2	3	0	0	8
Jakub Necas	F	27	2-7	2-3	0-1	5	1	1	0	6
Matúš Hronský	F	13	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	2	0	2
Chabi Barre	F	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	1	2
Maximus Edwards	G	7	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Eli Wilborn	F	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Lucas Prolla	G	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

60.0Possessions60.0

90.0Offensive Efficiency116.7

116.7Defensive Efficiency90.0

-26.7Net Efficiency26.7

37.7%Effective FG%61.8%

42.9%True Shooting %61.5%

21.3%Turnover Rate15.3%

39.6%Free Throw Rate7.3%

22.6%3-Point Rate45.5%

0.77Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Duquesne won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 60.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.