Mississippi Valley State logo

Mississippi Valley State

3-30
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
1.0%Mississippi Valley State
99.0%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -39.1
PROJECTED TOTAL155.7
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -9900
Tulsa logo

Tulsa

30-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 58
Projected Total155.7
Projected ScoreTulsa 97

Team Comparison

17.7MMH Power Index64.8
91.1Offensive Efficiency121.1
117.8Defensive Efficiency104.8
-26.7Net Efficiency16.3
-4.1Strength of Schedule0.0
-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
70.5Tempo70.2
45.8%Effective FG%55.4%
21.8%Turnover Rate15.4%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
34.5%Free Throw Rate42.4%
-18.8Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY99.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–17.7), offensive efficiency (121.1–91.1), defensive efficiency (104.8–117.8), net efficiency (16.3–-26.7).
Final
Mississippi Valley State logo
Mississippi Valley State
48—93
Tulsa logo
Tulsa
Tulsa by 45 • 70.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Mississippi Valley StateTEAM STATTulsa
18-60FG32-62
30.0%FG%52.0%
6-213PT11-33
29.0%3PT%33.0%
6-11FT18-25
55.0%FT%72.0%
23Rebounds52
5Offensive Rebounds14
6Assists18
10Turnovers11
8Steals6
3Blocks1
18Fouls8

Player Box Score

Mississippi Valley State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Antonio SiskG385-132-53-332200015
Arthur TateGuard293-112-50-03010008
Donovan SandersGuard263-111-30-00000007
Greg Moore Jr.G133-60-10-03120006
Daniel UmohCenter202-30-00-47021004
Darrion SaleryC150-40-13-41001003
Kendal ParkerG61-21-10-00000003
Jair HortonF121-40-10-00100002
Markell PetroGuard190-50-30-02200000
George Ivory IIIG160-10-10-02010000
Jonathan PaceF60-00-00-00001000
Tulsa
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Matt ReedF175-94-51-290000015
Tyshawn ArchieG214-72-54-554010014
Dwon OdomGuard225-50-02-265100012
Braeden CarringtonG272-72-73-42130009
Ian SmikleF213-50-03-46100009
Keaston WillisGuard253-112-90-05000008
Justin AmadiF133-40-01-16010007
Jesaiah McWrightG142-21-11-20200006
Tyler BehrendF112-40-22-35000006
Jaye NashG171-30-11-22410003
Ari SealsGuard71-20-10-01100002
Ben RadfordGuard31-20-10-01000002
Cal ConroyG20-10-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.6Possessions70.6
68.0Offensive Efficiency131.7
131.7Defensive Efficiency68.0
-63.7Net Efficiency63.7
35.0%Effective FG%60.5%
36.8%True Shooting %62.9%
14.2%Turnover Rate15.5%
18.3%Free Throw Rate40.3%
35.0%3-Point Rate53.2%
0.60Assist / Turnover1.64
Game Summary
Tulsa won by 45 points. The game played at approximately 70.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.