Austin Peay

22-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

11.1%Austin Peay

88.9%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -13.3

PROJECTED TOTAL161.7

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -801

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAustin Peay 74

Projected Total161.7

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 88

Team Comparison

Austin PeayMetricVanderbilt

54.8MMH Power Index68.9

115.0Offensive Efficiency120.9

103.1Defensive Efficiency105.7

11.9Net Efficiency15.2

-5.8Strength of Schedule7.4

8.1Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

71.0Tempo70.9

53.9%Effective FG%55.3%

15.3%Turnover Rate13.5%

30.3%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

39.0%Free Throw Rate39.3%

8.4Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–54.8), offensive efficiency (120.9–115.0), net efficiency (15.2–11.9), strength of schedule (7.4–-5.8).

Austin Peay COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.1–105.7), recent form (8.1–2.7).

Final

Austin Peay

55—85

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 30 • 72.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Austin PeayTEAM STATVanderbilt

19-60FG29-48

32.0%FG%60.0%

2-193PT8-18

11.0%3PT%44.0%

15-22FT19-27

68.0%FT%70.0%

29Rebounds40

11Offensive Rebounds6

9Assists18

14Turnovers17

9Steals8

1Blocks7

23Fouls14

Player Box Score

Austin Peay

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
LJ Thomas	G	37	6-17	0-4	8-11	4	3	1	0	20
Tate McCubbin	G	30	3-8	2-4	2-2	6	0	2	0	10
Sai Witt	Forward	26	3-9	0-0	1-4	6	2	0	1	7
Terrell Gaines	PG	26	1-6	0-3	2-2	2	0	2	0	4
Isaac Haney	Guard	20	1-3	0-2	2-3	2	0	1	0	4
Daniel Loos	Forward	15	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	4
Tekao Carpenter	G	17	1-7	0-4	0-0	3	0	1	0	2
Quan Lax	PG	15	1-4	0-2	0-0	0	2	1	0	2
Darius Dawson	Guard	3	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Akili Evans	Guard	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Anton Brookshire	PG	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
JaVar Daniel	F	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jason Edwards	G	21	5-8	1-3	5-8	2	0	1	0	16
Tyler Nickel	F	18	3-8	1-5	5-5	0	1	1	0	12
Devin McGlockton	F	19	4-7	1-3	2-4	9	1	1	2	11
AJ Hoggard	Guard	24	3-3	3-3	0-1	4	2	0	0	9
MJ Collins Jr.	G	24	3-5	2-2	1-2	2	2	1	0	9
Jaylen Carey	F	22	4-6	0-0	1-1	7	4	0	1	9
Chris Manon	Guard	22	3-3	0-0	2-2	8	1	3	3	8
Tyler Tanner	G	20	2-4	0-1	2-2	4	5	1	0	6
Jordan Williams	G	3	1-1	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	3
Grant Huffman	Guard	16	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	1	2
JaQualon Roberts	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Coleson Messer	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Miles Keeffe	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Hollman Smith	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Graham Calton	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.7Possessions72.7

75.7Offensive Efficiency116.9

116.9Defensive Efficiency75.7

-41.3Net Efficiency41.3

33.3%Effective FG%68.8%

39.0%True Shooting %69.9%

19.1%Turnover Rate23.7%

36.7%Free Throw Rate56.3%

31.7%3-Point Rate37.5%

0.64Assist / Turnover1.06

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 30 points. The game played at approximately 72.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.