
DePaul
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.6%DePaul
78.4%Northwestern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNorthwestern -7.9
PROJECTED TOTAL142.8
MODEL MONEYLINENorthwestern -363

Northwestern
15-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDePaul 67
Projected Total142.8
Projected ScoreNorthwestern 75
Team Comparison
48.4MMH Power Index55.4
103.7Offensive Efficiency111.6
102.7Defensive Efficiency109.8
1.0Net Efficiency1.8
2.0Strength of Schedule5.6
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.7
67.7Tempo65.6
49.9%Effective FG%51.9%
17.8%Turnover Rate13.0%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %28.2%
36.8%Free Throw Rate34.8%
0.7Average Margin1.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Northwestern HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNorthwestern holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.4–48.4), offensive efficiency (111.6–103.7), net efficiency (1.8–1.0), strength of schedule (5.6–2.0).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–109.8), offensive rebounding (29.7–28.2), free throw rate (36.8–34.8).