New Hampshire

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.0%New Hampshire

72.0%Stonehill

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADStonehill -7.2

PROJECTED TOTAL138.7

MODEL MONEYLINEStonehill -257

Stonehill

12-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 66

Projected Total138.7

Projected ScoreStonehill 73

Team Comparison

New HampshireMetricStonehill

34MMH Power Index37.9

99.6Offensive Efficiency97.5

107.5Defensive Efficiency100.7

-7.9Net Efficiency-3.2

-3.4Strength of Schedule-5.4

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4

69.4Tempo68.1

47.6%Effective FG%48.0%

16.1%Turnover Rate19.1%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %28.4%

29.4%Free Throw Rate29.2%

-5.5Average Margin-2.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Stonehill HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStonehill holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (37.9–34.0), defensive efficiency (100.7–107.5), net efficiency (-3.2–-7.9), recent form (-3.4–-17.6).

New Hampshire COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (99.6–97.5), strength of schedule (-3.4–-5.4), ball security (16.1–19.1).

Final

New Hampshire

83—90

Stonehill

Stonehill by 7 • 68.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New HampshireTEAM STATStonehill

28-57FG32-61

49.0%FG%52.0%

10-213PT8-22

48.0%3PT%36.0%

17-27FT18-22

63.0%FT%82.0%

30Rebounds38

11Offensive Rebounds12

12Assists21

10Turnovers9

4Steals8

2Blocks5

20Fouls20

Player Box Score

New Hampshire

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Sami Pissis	G	36	5-12	3-8	7-8	0	3	0	0	20
Khalil Badru	G	24	6-9	1-3	2-7	5	0	0	0	15
Giancarlo Bastianoni	Forward	35	5-12	1-2	3-4	12	1	1	1	14
Anthony McComb III	G	29	5-10	2-4	2-2	2	1	0	0	14
Antoni Siewruk	G	14	2-3	1-1	2-2	0	1	0	0	7
Jawarie Hamelin	Guard	30	2-3	1-1	0-0	2	5	1	0	5
Caleb Middleton	C	10	2-4	0-0	0-2	1	1	2	0	4
Dylan Saunders	F	15	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	1	3
Emmanuel Okpomo	Forward	7	0-2	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	1

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Louie Semona	F	22	9-12	2-4	2-2	6	2	0	0	22
Chas Stinson	G	32	6-10	0-0	4-5	2	5	3	2	16
Josh Morgan	Guard	30	4-8	0-3	4-4	3	2	1	0	12
Amir Nesbitt	Guard	26	4-8	4-6	0-0	2	1	2	0	12
Ethan Meuser	F	27	2-6	2-4	4-6	8	6	1	2	10
Todd Brogna	F	16	3-8	0-1	2-2	7	2	0	0	8
Hermann Koffi	G	35	2-7	0-4	1-2	3	3	0	0	5
Christopher Melis	Forward	12	2-2	0-0	1-1	4	0	1	1	5

Advanced Game Stats

68.7Possessions68.7

120.8Offensive Efficiency131.0

131.0Defensive Efficiency120.8

-10.2Net Efficiency10.2

57.9%Effective FG%59.0%

59.4%True Shooting %63.0%

14.5%Turnover Rate13.1%

47.4%Free Throw Rate36.1%

36.8%3-Point Rate36.1%

1.20Assist / Turnover2.33

Game Summary

Stonehill won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 68.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.