Binghamton

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

26.9%Binghamton

73.1%Army

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADArmy -7.2

PROJECTED TOTAL144.0

MODEL MONEYLINEArmy -272

Army

11-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBinghamton 68

Projected Total144.0

Projected ScoreArmy 76

Team Comparison

BinghamtonMetricArmy

32.4MMH Power Index36.8

102.2Offensive Efficiency104.8

112.3Defensive Efficiency112.1

-10.1Net Efficiency-7.3

-6.0Strength of Schedule-3.3

-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.6

64.2Tempo68.9

51.3%Effective FG%49.8%

18.5%Turnover Rate17.3%

21.5%Offensive Rebound %31.0%

42.8%Free Throw Rate26.5%

-6.5Average Margin-5.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Army HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArmy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (36.8–32.4), offensive efficiency (104.8–102.2), defensive efficiency (112.1–112.3), net efficiency (-7.3–-10.1).

Binghamton COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-6.2–-10.6), shooting efficiency (51.3–49.8), free throw rate (42.8–26.5).

Final

Binghamton

78—68

Army

Binghamton by 10 • 71.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATArmy

30-61FG24-62

49.0%FG%39.0%

9-153PT8-25

60.0%3PT%32.0%

9-11FT12-22

82.0%FT%55.0%

39Rebounds34

7Offensive Rebounds9

20Assists13

12Turnovers8

4Steals6

7Blocks4

16Fouls15

Player Box Score

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tymu Chenery	Guard	36	6-14	2-4	2-2	3	4	0	1	16
Chris Walker	G	36	7-11	2-3	0-0	5	4	2	1	16
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	22	6-11	0-0	3-3	3	3	0	0	15
Ben Callahan-Gold	Forward	23	5-9	2-5	0-0	0	0	0	1	12
Gavin Walsh	F	34	3-9	1-1	2-4	20	4	0	1	9
Evan Ashe	G	30	1-4	1-1	2-2	2	3	1	3	5
Wes Peterson Jr.	G	12	1-2	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Jayden Lemond	G	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	2	1	0	2

Army

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Josh Scovens	G	35	6-13	1-4	3-10	3	1	0	2	16
Jalen Rucker	Guard	34	5-14	2-6	2-2	4	3	2	0	14
Ryan Curry	G	34	4-11	2-5	0-0	7	3	3	0	10
Jorn Everson	F	13	3-7	1-3	2-2	2	0	1	0	9
AJ Allenspach	Forward	27	3-5	0-0	2-4	11	1	0	2	8
Blake Barker	Guard	25	1-5	1-4	3-4	2	2	0	0	6
Kevin McCarthy	G	5	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Jacen Holloway	F	15	1-4	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Kendall Hailey	Guard	11	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	0
Dayon Polk	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.4Possessions71.4

109.2Offensive Efficiency95.2

95.2Defensive Efficiency109.2

14.0Net Efficiency-14.0

56.6%Effective FG%45.2%

58.9%True Shooting %46.9%

16.8%Turnover Rate11.2%

18.0%Free Throw Rate35.5%

24.6%3-Point Rate40.3%

1.67Assist / Turnover1.63

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 71.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.