Fresno State logo

Fresno State

13-19
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.2%Fresno State
75.8%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -7.3
PROJECTED TOTAL153.9
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -313
UNLV logo

UNLV

18-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFresno State 73
Projected Total153.9
Projected ScoreUNLV 81

Team Comparison

47.1MMH Power Index52.8
104.9Offensive Efficiency111.0
104.9Defensive Efficiency109.6
0.0Net Efficiency1.4
1.5Strength of Schedule2.7
-6.0Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
69.4Tempo71.4
51.3%Effective FG%53.7%
18.2%Turnover Rate17.2%
28.2%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
35.5%Free Throw Rate41.6%
0.0Average Margin1.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UNLV HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–47.1), offensive efficiency (111.0–104.9), net efficiency (1.4–0.0), strength of schedule (2.7–1.5).
Fresno State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.9–109.6).
Final
Fresno State logo
Fresno State
77—87
UNLV logo
UNLV
UNLV by 10 • 68.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Fresno StateTEAM STATUNLV
27-58FG35-65
47.0%FG%54.0%
13-293PT10-24
45.0%3PT%42.0%
10-16FT7-9
63.0%FT%78.0%
27Rebounds39
6Offensive Rebounds10
19Assists19
9Turnovers10
7Steals5
4Blocks—
15Fouls15

Player Box Score

Fresno State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jasir TrembleGuard227-105-70-021100019
Mykell RobinsonForward396-144-92-487000018
Jalen WeaverGuard345-123-61-132010014
Elijah PriceF354-90-25-971210013
Zaon CollinsG373-51-20-04731007
Alex CrawfordF181-50-20-01001002
Mor SeckC80-00-02-20000002
Brian AmunekeG71-30-10-01110002
UNLV
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dedan Thomas Jr.G389-172-51-206000021
Jailen BedfordG155-93-45-631200018
Jaden HenleyG286-82-21-152100015
Pape N'DiayeF205-61-10-060000011
Jalen HillForward274-71-30-06100009
Julian RishwainGuard332-91-80-03520005
Jeremiah CherryF202-40-00-07100004
Brooklyn HicksG192-50-10-08300004

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9
111.8Offensive Efficiency126.3
126.3Defensive Efficiency111.8
-14.5Net Efficiency14.5
57.8%Effective FG%61.5%
58.7%True Shooting %62.8%
13.1%Turnover Rate14.4%
27.6%Free Throw Rate13.8%
50.0%3-Point Rate36.9%
2.11Assist / Turnover1.90
Game Summary
UNLV won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.