Hofstra

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

60.2%Hofstra

39.8%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -1.8

PROJECTED TOTAL145.6

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -151

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 74

Projected Total145.6

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 72

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricQuinnipiac

59.3MMH Power Index51

114.0Offensive Efficiency106.8

100.9Defensive Efficiency102.1

13.1Net Efficiency4.7

-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.3

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

66.2Tempo70.5

52.2%Effective FG%48.9%

16.1%Turnover Rate15.6%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

32.0%Free Throw Rate34.1%

8.7Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–51.0), offensive efficiency (114.0–106.8), defensive efficiency (100.9–102.1), net efficiency (13.1–4.7).

Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.3–-2.9), ball security (15.6–16.1), free throw rate (34.1–32.0).

Final

Hofstra

69—75

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac by 6 • 78.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATQuinnipiac

23-62FG22-75

37.0%FG%29.0%

6-163PT6-28

38.0%3PT%21.0%

17-17FT25-34

100.0%FT%74.0%

29Rebounds51

3Offensive Rebounds23

10Assists11

11Turnovers11

8Steals8

6Blocks7

22Fouls16

Player Box Score

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jean Aranguren	G	41	7-14	1-1	8-8	8	6	3	1	23
Cruz Davis	G	37	4-17	2-7	4-4	3	1	2	0	14
Michael Graham	Forward	34	4-9	0-0	0-0	13	0	1	3	8
German Plotnikov	G	34	2-5	2-3	0-0	1	2	1	2	6
KiJan Robinson	G	16	1-2	0-0	4-4	1	1	0	0	6
Khalil Farmer	G	9	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Jaquan Sanders	G	19	1-7	1-4	0-0	0	0	1	0	3
Silas Sunday	F	11	1-2	0-0	1-1	1	0	0	0	3
Joshua DeCady	F	14	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Eric Parnell	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
TJ Gadsden	Guard	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amarri Monroe	F	39	6-23	2-7	6-7	11	1	2	3	20
Paul Otieno	F	33	6-14	1-4	4-5	14	0	1	2	17
Khaden Bennett	G	30	2-8	0-2	6-8	3	2	1	0	10
Jaden Zimmerman	G	27	4-8	1-4	1-5	4	0	0	1	10
Alexis Reyes	Forward	30	2-5	1-4	2-2	7	1	2	0	7
Savion Lewis	Guard	32	1-7	0-0	2-2	7	7	2	0	4
Richie Springs	Forward	10	1-6	1-5	1-2	3	0	0	1	4
Ryan Mabrey	G	17	0-3	0-2	3-3	1	0	0	0	3
Doug Young	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Grant Randall	F	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

78.7Possessions78.7

87.7Offensive Efficiency95.3

95.3Defensive Efficiency87.7

-7.6Net Efficiency7.6

41.9%Effective FG%33.3%

49.2%True Shooting %41.1%

14.1%Turnover Rate13.9%

27.4%Free Throw Rate45.3%

25.8%3-Point Rate37.3%

0.91Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 78.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.