Navy

26-8

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.6%Navy

54.4%William & Mary

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -1.4

PROJECTED TOTAL151.7

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -119

William & Mary

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNavy 75

Projected Total151.7

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 77

Team Comparison

NavyMetricWilliam & Mary

56.8MMH Power Index53.8

113.2Offensive Efficiency112.5

97.6Defensive Efficiency105.2

15.6Net Efficiency7.3

-8.1Strength of Schedule-1.5

16.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

65.9Tempo73.9

53.7%Effective FG%55.3%

17.1%Turnover Rate16.4%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

40.9%Free Throw Rate45.3%

10.3Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Navy HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–53.8), offensive efficiency (113.2–112.5), defensive efficiency (97.6–105.2), net efficiency (15.6–7.3).

William & Mary COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.5–-8.1), shooting efficiency (55.3–53.7), ball security (16.4–17.1).

Final

Navy

76—82

William & Mary

William & Mary by 6 • 72.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NavyTEAM STATWilliam & Mary

24-54FG31-62

44.0%FG%50.0%

10-233PT13-33

43.0%3PT%39.0%

18-24FT7-14

75.0%FT%50.0%

37Rebounds31

8Offensive Rebounds7

12Assists20

15Turnovers10

6Steals8

2Blocks1

16Fouls16

Player Box Score

Navy

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Austin Benigni	G	33	3-6	1-3	9-10	3	3	1	0	16
Jinwoo Kim	G	34	5-11	3-4	2-3	2	1	0	0	15
Donovan Draper	F	26	4-6	2-2	4-4	7	2	0	0	14
Jordan Pennick	G	26	4-14	3-8	1-4	3	1	2	0	12
Aidan Kehoe	C	30	5-7	0-0	1-1	11	4	1	1	11
Mitch Fischer	Forward	10	2-2	0-0	1-2	1	1	1	0	5
Carnegie Johnson	Guard	7	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Jack Medalie	Forward	10	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Cam Cole	G	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Lysander Rehnstrom	Guard	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	0
Sam Krist	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Mike Woods	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keller Boothby	Forward	28	6-8	4-6	0-0	1	2	0	0	16
Gabe Dorsey	Guard	28	6-12	3-6	1-2	1	2	3	0	16
Noah Collier	F	23	7-9	0-1	0-0	7	1	0	1	14
Chase Lowe	G	25	3-4	0-0	5-8	8	5	3	0	11
Caleb Dorsey	Forward	20	4-9	3-7	0-0	4	3	0	0	11
Kyle Frazier	G	20	2-7	2-7	0-0	1	1	0	0	6
Isaiah Mbeng	G	24	1-3	1-1	1-2	2	3	0	0	4
Matteus Case	Guard	15	1-4	0-1	0-2	2	1	1	0	2
Malachi Ndur	Forward	12	1-5	0-4	0-0	3	2	1	0	2
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Luke Kinkade	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.1Possessions72.1

105.4Offensive Efficiency113.7

113.7Defensive Efficiency105.4

-8.3Net Efficiency8.3

53.7%Effective FG%60.5%

58.1%True Shooting %59.7%

20.7%Turnover Rate14.0%

44.4%Free Throw Rate22.6%

42.6%3-Point Rate53.2%

0.80Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 72.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.