Harvard logo

Harvard

17-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
53.1%Harvard
46.9%Iona
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIona -0.2
PROJECTED TOTAL141.9
MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -113
Iona logo

Iona

18-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 71
Projected Total141.9
Projected ScoreIona 71

Team Comparison

52.6MMH Power Index46.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency105.8
102.9Defensive Efficiency104.8
5.2Net Efficiency1.0
-0.1Strength of Schedule-1.6
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
64.8Tempo69.8
53.4%Effective FG%51.9%
17.2%Turnover Rate17.2%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %27.4%
27.9%Free Throw Rate29.9%
3.4Average Margin0.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–46.9), offensive efficiency (108.1–105.8), defensive efficiency (102.9–104.8), net efficiency (5.2–1.0).
Iona COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (27.4–26.3), free throw rate (29.9–27.9).
Final
Harvard logo
Harvard
67—61
Iona logo
Iona
Harvard by 6 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HarvardTEAM STATIona
20-44FG23-67
45.0%FG%34.0%
7-193PT3-18
37.0%3PT%17.0%
20-24FT12-14
83.0%FT%86.0%
34Rebounds34
8Offensive Rebounds18
14Assists12
19Turnovers11
6Steals12
9Blocks5
14Fouls19

Player Box Score

Harvard
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Thomas Batties IIIF374-91-27-882060016
Austin HuntG245-91-35-623210016
Tey BarbourG234-63-53-321000014
Chandler PiggeG375-82-40-132220012
Robert HintonG210-50-14-46200004
Louis LesmondG251-20-11-22100003
Evan NelsonG201-50-30-05210002
Ben EisendrathG130-00-00-00110000
Iona
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dejour ReavesG378-183-66-742400025
Adam NjieG265-160-42-213400012
Yaphet MoundiF203-60-02-35004008
Christian WinborneG212-60-12-21110006
Justin MenardG192-50-30-00200004
Biggie PattersonG301-90-30-015330002
Kernan BundyG161-30-00-02000002
Jacob HogarthF41-10-00-00000002
Clarence RupertForward150-20-10-03100000
Jalen BarrGuard100-10-00-00001000
Comeh EmuoborG20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6
100.6Offensive Efficiency91.6
91.6Defensive Efficiency100.6
9.0Net Efficiency-9.0
53.4%Effective FG%36.6%
60.5%True Shooting %41.4%
28.6%Turnover Rate16.5%
54.5%Free Throw Rate20.9%
43.2%3-Point Rate26.9%
0.74Assist / Turnover1.09
Game Summary
Harvard won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.