
Binghamton
8-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.0%Binghamton
93.0%Marist
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMarist -18.4
PROJECTED TOTAL134.2
MODEL MONEYLINEMarist -1329

Marist
19-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBinghamton 58
Projected Total134.2
Projected ScoreMarist 76
Team Comparison
32.4MMH Power Index51
102.2Offensive Efficiency104.3
112.3Defensive Efficiency95.6
-10.1Net Efficiency8.7
-6.0Strength of Schedule-3.2
-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
64.2Tempo66.8
51.3%Effective FG%49.9%
18.5%Turnover Rate16.8%
21.5%Offensive Rebound %29.4%
42.8%Free Throw Rate26.1%
-6.5Average Margin5.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Marist HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMarist holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–32.4), offensive efficiency (104.3–102.2), defensive efficiency (95.6–112.3), net efficiency (8.7–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.3–49.9), free throw rate (42.8–26.1).