Longwood

16-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

9.7%Longwood

90.3%SMU

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSMU -13.9

PROJECTED TOTAL160.6

MODEL MONEYLINESMU -931

SMU

20-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLongwood 73

Projected Total160.6

Projected ScoreSMU 87

Team Comparison

LongwoodMetricSMU

47MMH Power Index62.5

108.1Offensive Efficiency118.2

103.0Defensive Efficiency109.6

5.1Net Efficiency8.6

-6.4Strength of Schedule7.0

2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3

71.9Tempo71.1

51.4%Effective FG%55.7%

19.3%Turnover Rate15.7%

35.4%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

42.0%Free Throw Rate31.3%

3.6Average Margin6.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–47.0), offensive efficiency (118.2–108.1), net efficiency (8.6–5.1), strength of schedule (7.0–-6.4).

Longwood COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.0–109.6), recent form (2.3–-1.3), offensive rebounding (35.4–35.0).

Final

Longwood

82—98

SMU

SMU by 16 • 76.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LongwoodTEAM STATSMU

34-72FG31-50

47.0%FG%62.0%

4-143PT10-20

29.0%3PT%50.0%

10-14FT26-31

71.0%FT%84.0%

30Rebounds33

15Offensive Rebounds8

21Assists18

13Turnovers20

10Steals7

1Blocks4

21Fouls14

Player Box Score

Longwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Elijah Tucker	F	24	8-16	0-0	4-8	6	0	0	0	20
Colby Garland	G	35	9-14	0-0	1-1	2	11	1	0	19
Emanuel Richards	G	24	4-7	2-3	2-2	4	2	0	0	12
Michael Christmas	Forward	30	4-11	1-5	0-0	6	0	0	0	9
Johan Nziemi	F	16	4-8	0-0	1-1	4	0	2	1	9
DJ Jefferson	G	12	3-5	1-2	0-0	1	2	1	0	7
Kyrell Luc	Guard	29	2-9	0-2	2-2	3	5	3	0	6
KJ McClurg	G	12	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Angelo Brizzi	G	10	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	2	0	0
Jaylen Benard	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Trey Hicks	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Leo Nordberg	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

SMU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Boopie Miller	G	31	6-7	2-2	10-12	5	7	2	0	24
Yohan Traore	F	28	7-10	2-4	4-4	11	0	0	0	20
Matt Cross	Forward	31	6-10	2-5	5-6	4	4	1	1	19
Chuck Harris	Guard	22	4-8	2-4	2-3	0	1	0	0	12
Kario Oquendo	Guard	18	3-7	1-3	2-2	1	0	2	0	9
B.J. Edwards	G	28	3-5	0-1	0-0	1	5	2	1	6
Samet Yigitoglu	C	20	0-0	0-0	3-4	8	1	0	0	3
Keon Ambrose-Hylton	Forward	8	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Jerrell Colbert	F	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2	2
Tibet Gorener	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
AJ George	G	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

76.7Possessions76.7

106.9Offensive Efficiency127.8

127.8Defensive Efficiency106.9

-20.9Net Efficiency20.9

50.0%Effective FG%72.0%

52.1%True Shooting %75.7%

17.0%Turnover Rate26.1%

19.4%Free Throw Rate62.0%

19.4%3-Point Rate40.0%

1.62Assist / Turnover0.90

Game Summary

SMU won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 76.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.