
UTSA
5-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.0%UTSA
77.0%Army
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADArmy -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL151.8
MODEL MONEYLINEArmy -335

Army
11-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTSA 71
Projected Total151.8
Projected ScoreArmy 81
Team Comparison
30.5MMH Power Index36.8
99.0Offensive Efficiency104.8
115.0Defensive Efficiency112.1
-16.0Net Efficiency-7.3
-1.2Strength of Schedule-3.3
-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.6
70.2Tempo68.9
45.9%Effective FG%49.8%
17.0%Turnover Rate17.3%
30.9%Offensive Rebound %31.0%
29.9%Free Throw Rate26.5%
-11.3Average Margin-5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Army HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArmy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (36.8–30.5), offensive efficiency (104.8–99.0), defensive efficiency (112.1–115.0), net efficiency (-7.3–-16.0).
UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-3.3), ball security (17.0–17.3), free throw rate (29.9–26.5).