New Orleans

16-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.0%New Orleans

95.0%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -20.3

PROJECTED TOTAL160.7

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -1900

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNew Orleans 70

Projected Total160.7

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 90

Team Comparison

New OrleansMetricVanderbilt

47.1MMH Power Index68.9

107.0Offensive Efficiency120.9

109.6Defensive Efficiency105.7

-2.6Net Efficiency15.2

0.2Strength of Schedule7.4

0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

70.8Tempo70.9

50.5%Effective FG%55.3%

20.2%Turnover Rate13.5%

35.7%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

48.4%Free Throw Rate39.3%

-1.8Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–47.1), offensive efficiency (120.9–107.0), defensive efficiency (105.7–109.6), net efficiency (15.2–-2.6).

New Orleans COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.7–30.8), free throw rate (48.4–39.3).

Final

New Orleans

56—100

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 44 • 78.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New OrleansTEAM STATVanderbilt

19-55FG36-76

35.0%FG%47.0%

4-173PT14-34

24.0%3PT%41.0%

14-23FT14-15

61.0%FT%93.0%

35Rebounds43

10Offensive Rebounds14

12Assists22

22Turnovers9

7Steals15

4Blocks5

13Fouls18

Player Box Score

New Orleans

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
James White	Guard	32	6-17	1-4	5-7	6	1	0	0	18
Theo Grant	Guard	25	4-9	1-5	0-0	6	0	1	1	9
Jamond Vincent	Guard	13	3-4	1-2	2-2	1	0	0	0	9
MJ Thomas	F	26	3-8	0-0	2-5	4	0	1	0	8
Jackson Sowards	Forward	1	1-1	0-0	2-4	1	0	1	0	4
Jah Short	Guard	31	1-7	1-4	0-0	7	5	0	2	3
Grant Kemp	G	20	1-2	0-1	1-1	2	2	2	0	3
Luke Davis	F	14	0-2	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	1	2
JR Jacobs	Guard	10	0-3	0-0	0-0	2	2	2	0	0
Leland Coleman	F	10	0-0	0-0	0-2	1	1	0	0	0
Kohen Rowbatham	G	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Dae Dae Hunter	Guard	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Nickel	F	26	7-14	5-10	0-0	4	2	1	0	19
Jason Edwards	G	19	5-14	3-8	4-4	5	2	2	0	17
Tyler Tanner	G	18	6-9	2-3	2-2	7	1	3	1	16
Devin McGlockton	F	22	6-6	2-2	0-0	10	0	0	0	14
AJ Hoggard	Guard	23	3-9	0-3	1-1	1	8	3	0	7
MJ Collins Jr.	G	20	3-9	1-5	0-0	0	0	0	0	7
Chris Manon	Guard	17	2-3	0-1	2-2	1	3	3	2	6
Grant Huffman	Guard	21	2-7	1-2	0-0	3	5	3	1	5
Jaylen Carey	F	15	0-1	0-0	4-4	7	0	0	1	4
JaQualon Roberts	F	7	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Jordan Williams	G	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Miles Keeffe	G	2	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	1	0	0	1
Coleson Messer	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Graham Calton	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Hollman Smith	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

78.0Possessions78.0

71.8Offensive Efficiency128.2

128.2Defensive Efficiency71.8

-56.4Net Efficiency56.4

38.2%Effective FG%56.6%

42.5%True Shooting %60.2%

28.2%Turnover Rate11.5%

41.8%Free Throw Rate19.7%

30.9%3-Point Rate44.7%

0.55Assist / Turnover2.44

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 44 points. The game played at approximately 78.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.