Drake

14-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

16.0%Drake

84.0%UIC

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUIC -11.2

PROJECTED TOTAL149.5

MODEL MONEYLINEUIC -525

UIC

19-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDrake 69

Projected Total149.5

Projected ScoreUIC 80

Team Comparison

DrakeMetricUIC

46.4MMH Power Index56.7

109.5Offensive Efficiency110.5

109.1Defensive Efficiency103.3

0.4Net Efficiency7.2

0.3Strength of Schedule0.1

-11.3Last 10 Net Efficiency9.2

68.6Tempo68.3

52.2%Effective FG%50.9%

14.9%Turnover Rate17.6%

27.2%Offensive Rebound %36.8%

34.4%Free Throw Rate37.2%

0.2Average Margin4.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UIC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUIC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.7–46.4), offensive efficiency (110.5–109.5), defensive efficiency (103.3–109.1), net efficiency (7.2–0.4).

Drake COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.3–0.1), shooting efficiency (52.2–50.9), ball security (14.9–17.6).

Final

Drake

70—74

UIC

UIC by 4 • 59.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DrakeTEAM STATUIC

28-57FG27-47

49.0%FG%57.0%

6-193PT8-17

32.0%3PT%47.0%

8-11FT12-17

73.0%FT%71.0%

28Rebounds19

13Offensive Rebounds6

17Assists16

12Turnovers8

4Steals2

1Blocks3

18Fouls12

Player Box Score

Drake

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bennett Stirtz	G	40	12-19	4-9	2-2	5	12	1	0	30
Cam Manyawu	F	24	6-10	0-0	1-1	12	0	2	1	13
Daniel Abreu	Forward	34	3-8	1-4	2-2	2	1	1	0	9
Tavion Banks	G	19	4-9	0-0	1-2	4	2	0	0	9
Mitch Mascari	Guard	34	1-5	1-5	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Nate Ferguson	Forward	11	1-1	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	3
Isaiah Jackson	Guard	29	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Isaia Howard	G	9	0-2	0-1	1-2	0	0	0	0	1

UIC

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jordan Mason	G	32	7-9	2-2	1-2	1	5	0	1	17
Javon Jackson	G	35	3-6	0-0	10-12	1	4	0	0	16
Tyem Freeman	Guard	32	5-8	5-7	0-0	1	0	0	0	15
Saša Ciani	F	17	4-5	0-0	1-2	5	1	0	1	9
Filip Skobalj	Not Available	30	3-8	1-5	0-0	2	1	0	0	7
Modestas Kancleris	Forward	20	3-5	0-0	0-1	2	1	0	1	6
Ethan Pickett	G	20	2-4	0-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	4
Ahmad Henderson II	G	14	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	4	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

59.2Possessions59.2

118.2Offensive Efficiency125.0

125.0Defensive Efficiency118.2

-6.8Net Efficiency6.8

54.4%Effective FG%66.0%

56.2%True Shooting %67.2%

19.6%Turnover Rate14.0%

19.3%Free Throw Rate36.2%

33.3%3-Point Rate36.2%

1.42Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

UIC won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 59.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.