Stanford

20-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

35.7%Stanford

64.3%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -5.7

PROJECTED TOTAL142.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -180

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreStanford 68

Projected Total142.6

Projected ScoreClemson 74

Team Comparison

StanfordMetricClemson

59.2MMH Power Index59.9

111.6Offensive Efficiency112.6

107.1Defensive Efficiency101.4

4.5Net Efficiency11.2

5.2Strength of Schedule4.6

7.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

68.1Tempo63.6

51.9%Effective FG%53.0%

15.5%Turnover Rate14.0%

32.4%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

37.2%Free Throw Rate38.1%

3.0Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–59.2), offensive efficiency (112.6–111.6), defensive efficiency (101.4–107.1), net efficiency (11.2–4.5).

Stanford COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.2–4.6), recent form (7.4–-4.7), offensive rebounding (32.4–27.0).

Final

Stanford

71—85

Clemson

Clemson by 14 • 69.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StanfordTEAM STATClemson

27-61FG28-58

44.0%FG%48.0%

6-203PT8-19

30.0%3PT%42.0%

11-12FT21-24

92.0%FT%88.0%

36Rebounds32

14Offensive Rebounds11

8Assists14

17Turnovers10

6Steals16

4Blocks6

20Fouls14

Player Box Score

Stanford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Oziyah Sellers	G	36	7-9	2-3	4-4	4	0	0	0	20
Maxime Raynaud	Forward	35	7-17	0-5	0-0	13	1	0	2	14
Jaylen Blakes	Guard	35	4-12	1-4	4-5	1	5	2	0	13
Aidan Cammann	F	24	2-3	1-1	0-0	5	1	1	1	5
Ryan Agarwal	G	21	2-6	1-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	5
Tallis Toure	F	9	1-1	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	0	4
Benny Gealer	G	14	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Chisom Okpara	F	11	1-6	0-0	1-1	3	0	2	0	3
Evan Stinson	F	11	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Anthony Batson Jr.	G	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	2
Jaylen Thompson	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chase Hunter	Guard	36	7-15	2-4	6-6	2	2	2	0	22
Chauncey Wiggins	F	31	6-11	4-5	1-2	5	0	0	1	17
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	37	6-13	0-5	4-5	5	6	4	0	16
Viktor Lakhin	Center	22	4-6	1-1	2-2	7	2	3	5	11
Dillon Hunter	G	20	1-1	0-0	4-4	2	1	6	0	6
Myles Foster	Forward	8	2-2	0-0	2-3	1	0	0	0	6
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	25	1-6	0-1	2-2	4	2	0	0	4
Jake Heidbreder	G	16	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	1	1	0	3
Christian Reeves	C	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Del Jones	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.1Possessions69.1

102.7Offensive Efficiency123.0

123.0Defensive Efficiency102.7

-20.3Net Efficiency20.3

49.2%Effective FG%55.2%

53.2%True Shooting %61.2%

24.4%Turnover Rate14.6%

19.7%Free Throw Rate41.4%

32.8%3-Point Rate32.8%

0.47Assist / Turnover1.40

Game Summary

Clemson won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 69.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.