William & Mary

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

24.6%William & Mary

75.4%Hofstra

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -8.1

PROJECTED TOTAL153.9

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -307

Hofstra

24-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 73

Projected Total153.9

Projected ScoreHofstra 81

Team Comparison

William & MaryMetricHofstra

53.8MMH Power Index59.3

112.5Offensive Efficiency114.0

105.2Defensive Efficiency100.9

7.3Net Efficiency13.1

-1.5Strength of Schedule-2.9

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

73.9Tempo66.2

55.3%Effective FG%52.2%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.1%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

45.3%Free Throw Rate32.0%

5.4Average Margin8.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–53.8), offensive efficiency (114.0–112.5), defensive efficiency (100.9–105.2), net efficiency (13.1–7.3).

William & Mary COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.5–-2.9), shooting efficiency (55.3–52.2), free throw rate (45.3–32.0).

Final

William & Mary

74—56

Hofstra

William & Mary by 18 • 66.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATHofstra

27-51FG21-56

53.0%FG%38.0%

12-213PT9-37

57.0%3PT%24.0%

8-13FT5-7

62.0%FT%71.0%

38Rebounds24

4Offensive Rebounds1

16Assists18

13Turnovers9

6Steals8

—Blocks4

9Fouls17

Player Box Score

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Matteus Case	Guard	24	6-9	3-5	0-0	2	3	1	15
Noah Collier	F	25	6-11	0-0	0-0	8	0	0	12
Kyle Frazier	G	21	3-4	3-4	3-4	2	1	1	12
Chase Lowe	G	29	4-6	1-1	2-5	6	5	0	11
Gabe Dorsey	Guard	27	3-5	3-5	0-0	2	1	2	9
Isaiah Mbeng	G	20	3-7	1-1	0-0	3	5	0	7
Caleb Dorsey	Forward	19	1-4	0-1	3-4	6	0	1	5
Keller Boothby	Forward	25	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	1	1	3
Malachi Ndur	Forward	10	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaquan Sanders	G	33	5-16	4-13	1-2	2	4	1	0	15
TJ Gadsden	Guard	20	5-6	2-3	0-0	2	0	1	0	12
Jean Aranguren	G	27	4-16	1-12	1-2	3	7	2	0	10
German Plotnikov	G	35	2-3	2-3	2-2	6	3	3	0	8
Joshua DeCady	F	23	3-3	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	3	6
Cruz Davis	G	39	2-10	0-4	1-1	4	4	1	0	5
Michael Graham	Forward	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
KiJan Robinson	G	7	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Silas Sunday	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Khalil Farmer	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.8Possessions66.8

110.8Offensive Efficiency83.8

83.8Defensive Efficiency110.8

26.9Net Efficiency-26.9

64.7%Effective FG%45.5%

64.7%True Shooting %47.2%

19.6%Turnover Rate13.4%

25.5%Free Throw Rate12.5%

41.2%3-Point Rate66.1%

1.23Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 66.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.