
Stetson
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.0%Stetson
86.0%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -12.4
PROJECTED TOTAL165.2
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -614

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStetson 76
Projected Total165.2
Projected ScoreQueens University 89
Team Comparison
40MMH Power Index51.7
107.2Offensive Efficiency118.4
115.9Defensive Efficiency117.0
-8.7Net Efficiency1.4
-1.0Strength of Schedule0.1
-2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
68.7Tempo71.4
53.8%Effective FG%56.6%
18.3%Turnover Rate14.8%
28.1%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
33.6%Free Throw Rate37.6%
-6.0Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–40.0), offensive efficiency (118.4–107.2), net efficiency (1.4–-8.7), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.0).
Stetson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (115.9–117.0).