Middle Tennessee

17-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

43.2%Middle Tennessee

56.8%Florida International

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida International -3.0

PROJECTED TOTAL156.2

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida International -131

Florida International

15-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiddle Tennessee 77

Projected Total156.2

Projected ScoreFlorida International 80

Team Comparison

Middle TennesseeMetricFlorida International

52.5MMH Power Index50.4

109.6Offensive Efficiency109.6

105.7Defensive Efficiency105.9

3.9Net Efficiency3.7

0.4Strength of Schedule-1.5

3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.9

68.8Tempo73.6

52.2%Effective FG%51.6%

16.7%Turnover Rate17.7%

31.3%Offensive Rebound %35.1%

33.2%Free Throw Rate40.1%

2.7Average Margin2.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Middle Tennessee HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiddle Tennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.5–50.4), defensive efficiency (105.7–105.9), net efficiency (3.9–3.7), strength of schedule (0.4–-1.5).

Florida International COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.1–31.3), free throw rate (40.1–33.2), average scoring margin (2.8–2.7).

Final

Middle Tennessee

73—69

Florida International

Middle Tennessee by 4 • 72.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Middle TennesseeTEAM STATFlorida International

26-57FG29-57

46.0%FG%51.0%

6-193PT6-15

32.0%3PT%40.0%

15-23FT5-6

65.0%FT%83.0%

29Rebounds33

8Offensive Rebounds8

13Assists17

14Turnovers20

11Steals9

4Blocks7

11Fouls16

Player Box Score

Middle Tennessee

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jlynn Counter	G	30	6-8	1-3	4-5	5	3	2	0	17
Camryn Weston	Guard	34	5-14	2-6	3-4	5	2	2	0	15
Jestin Porter	G	31	3-12	2-6	3-3	0	1	2	0	11
Essam Mostafa	Forward	28	4-7	0-0	3-5	5	2	3	0	11
Torey Alston	F	19	3-4	0-0	1-4	4	1	2	2	7
Tre Green	G	11	2-5	0-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Justin Bufford	Guard	25	1-5	0-0	1-2	4	3	0	2	3
Chris Loofe	F	12	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Jacob Johnson	Guard	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2

Florida International

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Vianney Salatchoum	C	24	10-14	1-1	0-0	5	0	1	0	21
Asim Jones	G	34	6-9	1-2	2-2	4	5	2	2	15
Dashon Gittens	G	31	3-8	2-3	2-2	3	1	2	1	10
Travis Gray	G	21	4-12	1-5	0-0	5	2	1	2	9
George Pridgett Jr.	Guard	14	2-2	1-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	5
Jaden Grant	Guard	16	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	4
Jonathan Aybar	Forward	19	1-5	0-2	1-2	6	3	1	0	3
Dante Wilcox	Forward	20	1-3	0-1	0-0	4	3	1	2	2
Ashton Williamson	G	18	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	0
Kole Williams	Guard	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.9Possessions72.9

100.1Offensive Efficiency94.7

94.7Defensive Efficiency100.1

5.5Net Efficiency-5.5

50.9%Effective FG%56.1%

53.7%True Shooting %57.6%

18.9%Turnover Rate27.8%

40.4%Free Throw Rate10.5%

33.3%3-Point Rate26.3%

0.93Assist / Turnover0.85

Game Summary

Middle Tennessee won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 72.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.