
Florida Gulf Coast
16-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.8%Florida Gulf Coast
70.2%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL165.6
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -236

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida Gulf Coast 80
Projected Total165.6
Projected ScoreQueens University 86
Team Comparison
48.6MMH Power Index51.7
110.5Offensive Efficiency118.4
109.2Defensive Efficiency117.0
1.3Net Efficiency1.4
-1.8Strength of Schedule0.1
0.7Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
70.0Tempo71.4
52.1%Effective FG%56.6%
15.7%Turnover Rate14.8%
32.3%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
29.9%Free Throw Rate37.6%
0.9Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–48.6), offensive efficiency (118.4–110.5), net efficiency (1.4–1.3), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.8).
Florida Gulf Coast COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.2–117.0), offensive rebounding (32.3–29.6).