UMBC

24-8

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

92.2%UMBC

7.8%Binghamton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUMBC -14.8

PROJECTED TOTAL137.4

MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -1182

Binghamton

8-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUMBC 76

Projected Total137.4

Projected ScoreBinghamton 61

Team Comparison

UMBCMetricBinghamton

59.1MMH Power Index32.4

113.0Offensive Efficiency102.2

99.0Defensive Efficiency112.3

14.0Net Efficiency-10.1

-5.6Strength of Schedule-6.0

24.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2

65.5Tempo64.2

54.3%Effective FG%51.3%

14.3%Turnover Rate18.5%

25.2%Offensive Rebound %21.5%

34.1%Free Throw Rate42.8%

9.1Average Margin-6.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–32.4), offensive efficiency (113.0–102.2), defensive efficiency (99.0–112.3), net efficiency (14.0–-10.1).

Binghamton COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.8–34.1).

Final

UMBC

82—87

Binghamton

Binghamton by 5 • 68.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UMBCTEAM STATBinghamton

32-58FG32-58

55.0%FG%55.0%

5-153PT6-15

33.0%3PT%40.0%

13-17FT17-21

76.0%FT%81.0%

22Rebounds34

4Offensive Rebounds9

11Assists11

6Turnovers10

6Steals3

2Blocks1

16Fouls16

Player Box Score

UMBC

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bryce Johnson	Guard	36	7-14	0-2	9-9	4	3	1	0	23
Marcus Banks Jr.	G	33	7-13	3-6	0-0	1	1	0	1	17
Marlon Short	Guard	28	6-11	0-1	1-3	2	1	1	1	13
Josh Odunowo	F	25	5-6	0-0	0-1	5	0	1	0	10
Ace Valentine	G	33	4-7	1-2	0-0	1	4	0	0	9
Regimantas Ciunys	F	16	1-1	0-0	1-2	5	0	1	0	3
JC Harris	Guard	9	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	1	0	3
Devan Sapp	Guard	12	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Daylon Dickerson	F	8	0-2	0-1	2-2	2	1	1	0	2

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chris Walker	G	35	7-11	4-7	3-4	5	2	0	1	21
Gavin Walsh	F	37	5-12	2-2	6-6	17	0	1	0	18
Wes Peterson Jr.	G	35	5-9	0-2	4-5	4	1	0	0	14
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	20	7-8	0-0	0-2	1	2	1	0	14
Tymu Chenery	Guard	29	4-10	0-3	2-2	3	3	0	0	10
Evan Ashe	G	28	4-6	0-0	0-0	2	2	0	0	8
Ben Callahan-Gold	Forward	16	0-2	0-1	2-2	0	1	1	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

68.6Possessions68.6

119.5Offensive Efficiency126.8

126.8Defensive Efficiency119.5

-7.3Net Efficiency7.3

59.5%Effective FG%60.3%

62.1%True Shooting %64.0%

8.8%Turnover Rate14.5%

29.3%Free Throw Rate36.2%

25.9%3-Point Rate25.9%

1.83Assist / Turnover1.10

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 68.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.