
Vanderbilt
27-9GAME THAT MATTERSAT
75.6%Vanderbilt
24.4%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -6.5
PROJECTED TOTAL164.8
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -310

LSU
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 86
Projected Total164.8
Projected ScoreLSU 79
Team Comparison
68.9MMH Power Index54.2
120.9Offensive Efficiency115.5
105.7Defensive Efficiency111.3
15.2Net Efficiency4.2
7.4Strength of Schedule4.5
2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8
70.9Tempo70.5
55.3%Effective FG%53.4%
13.5%Turnover Rate15.6%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
39.3%Free Throw Rate41.9%
10.8Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–54.2), offensive efficiency (120.9–115.5), defensive efficiency (105.7–111.3), net efficiency (15.2–4.2).
LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.2–30.8), free throw rate (41.9–39.3).