UTSA

5-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

11.4%UTSA

88.6%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTulane -14.1

PROJECTED TOTAL150.8

MODEL MONEYLINETulane -777

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 68

Projected Total150.8

Projected ScoreTulane 82

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricTulane

30.5MMH Power Index44.3

99.0Offensive Efficiency105.3

115.0Defensive Efficiency109.9

-16.0Net Efficiency-4.6

-1.2Strength of Schedule2.7

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

70.2Tempo68.7

45.9%Effective FG%49.6%

17.0%Turnover Rate15.6%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

29.9%Free Throw Rate44.8%

-11.3Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Tulane HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulane holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.3–30.5), offensive efficiency (105.3–99.0), defensive efficiency (109.9–115.0), net efficiency (-4.6–-16.0).

UTSA COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.9–22.8).

Final

UTSA

63—92

Tulane

Tulane by 29 • 74.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATTulane

21-61FG33-52

34.0%FG%63.0%

5-263PT7-18

19.0%3PT%39.0%

16-21FT19-24

76.0%FT%79.0%

29Rebounds37

11Offensive Rebounds3

11Assists25

14Turnovers14

9Steals10

2Blocks5

18Fouls19

Player Box Score

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Raekwon Horton	Forward	40	5-8	1-3	6-8	9	3	3	0	17
Tai'Reon Joseph	G	34	5-14	0-6	4-5	3	2	2	1	14
Jaquan Scott	F	15	2-5	2-2	2-4	4	0	0	1	8
Primo Spears	Guard	32	3-14	0-3	0-0	1	4	2	0	6
Marcus Millender	G	31	2-7	0-2	2-2	2	1	1	0	6
Damari Monsanto	Guard	15	2-9	2-8	0-0	2	0	1	0	6
Jonnivius Smith	Forward	12	1-1	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	4
David Hermes	F	17	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Nazar Mahmoud	G	4	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kaleb Banks	F	34	11-15	0-3	2-2	6	4	3	3	24
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	34	8-10	2-4	5-6	5	6	2	0	23
Kam Williams	G	30	3-6	2-4	3-3	4	1	0	2	11
Asher Woods	G	31	4-8	1-3	0-0	4	4	0	0	9
Gregg Glenn III	F	28	3-5	0-0	3-5	8	7	1	0	9
Mari Jordan	G	12	2-5	0-2	2-2	2	0	2	0	6
KJ Greene	G	12	1-2	1-1	2-2	2	2	2	0	5
Jake Shapiro	G	1	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Tyler Ringgold	F	3	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Percy Daniels	C	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Spencer Elliott	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	0
Michael Eley	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Joseph Teich	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

74.2Possessions74.2

84.9Offensive Efficiency124.0

124.0Defensive Efficiency84.9

-39.1Net Efficiency39.1

38.5%Effective FG%70.2%

44.4%True Shooting %72.6%

18.9%Turnover Rate18.8%

34.4%Free Throw Rate46.2%

42.6%3-Point Rate34.6%

0.79Assist / Turnover1.79

Game Summary

Tulane won by 29 points. The game played at approximately 74.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.