UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

61.3%UT Rio Grande Valley

38.7%New Orleans

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -3.0

PROJECTED TOTAL151.2

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -158

New Orleans

16-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 77

Projected Total151.2

Projected ScoreNew Orleans 74

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricNew Orleans

55.8MMH Power Index47.1

112.6Offensive Efficiency107.0

103.1Defensive Efficiency109.6

9.5Net Efficiency-2.6

-1.9Strength of Schedule0.2

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency0.4

67.4Tempo70.8

55.7%Effective FG%50.5%

17.9%Turnover Rate20.2%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %35.7%

29.6%Free Throw Rate48.4%

6.4Average Margin-1.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–47.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–107.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–109.6), net efficiency (9.5–-2.6).

New Orleans COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.2–-1.9), offensive rebounding (35.7–29.2), free throw rate (48.4–29.6).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

76—64

New Orleans

UT Rio Grande Valley by 12 • 65.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATNew Orleans

26-66FG24-62

39.0%FG%39.0%

13-393PT3-15

33.0%3PT%20.0%

11-18FT13-17

61.0%FT%76.0%

50Rebounds35

21Offensive Rebounds12

19Assists10

11Turnovers8

6Steals1

4Blocks1

19Fouls18

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Hasan Abdul Hakim	G	32	8-15	3-6	3-6	12	2	2	0	22
Kwo Agwa	F	22	4-6	1-1	4-4	7	1	0	2	13
K.T. Raimey	Guard	17	4-8	4-7	0-2	1	2	1	1	12
Howie Fleming Jr.	G	22	3-8	2-6	1-2	7	4	0	1	9
DK Thorn	Guard	26	2-6	1-3	2-2	5	1	2	0	7
Cliff Davis	G	32	2-12	1-10	0-0	8	2	0	0	5
Trey Miller	G	32	2-6	0-3	0-0	2	3	0	0	4
Marshal Destremau	F	16	1-4	1-2	1-2	5	4	1	0	4
RJ Nance	Guard	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

New Orleans

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
James White	Guard	38	11-23	0-3	1-2	8	1	1	0	23
MJ Thomas	F	35	4-11	0-0	4-6	11	1	0	0	12
Dae Dae Hunter	Guard	33	4-10	3-6	0-0	1	0	0	0	11
Jah Short	Guard	38	3-10	0-4	3-3	5	3	0	1	9
Theo Grant	Guard	24	1-3	0-1	4-5	3	1	0	0	6
Leland Coleman	F	9	1-3	0-0	1-1	2	1	0	0	3
JR Jacobs	Guard	20	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	3	0	0	0
Kohen Rowbatham	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.4Possessions65.4

116.2Offensive Efficiency97.9

97.9Defensive Efficiency116.2

18.3Net Efficiency-18.3

49.2%Effective FG%41.1%

51.0%True Shooting %45.7%

17.0%Turnover Rate12.1%

27.3%Free Throw Rate27.4%

59.1%3-Point Rate24.2%

1.73Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 65.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.