
Southern Utah
10-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.6%Southern Utah
93.4%Grand Canyon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -18.0
PROJECTED TOTAL152.1
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -1415

Grand Canyon
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSouthern Utah 67
Projected Total152.1
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 85
Team Comparison
40.6MMH Power Index59.8
105.6Offensive Efficiency109.2
110.0Defensive Efficiency99.1
-4.4Net Efficiency10.1
-3.0Strength of Schedule2.0
-3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency9.7
72.3Tempo69.3
52.6%Effective FG%52.1%
19.6%Turnover Rate17.6%
30.3%Offensive Rebound %31.2%
34.4%Free Throw Rate41.0%
-3.2Average Margin7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–40.6), offensive efficiency (109.2–105.6), defensive efficiency (99.1–110.0), net efficiency (10.1–-4.4).
Southern Utah COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.6–52.1).