California

22-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

29.2%California

70.8%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -6.6

PROJECTED TOTAL144.2

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -242

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCalifornia 69

Projected Total144.2

Projected ScoreClemson 75

Team Comparison

CaliforniaMetricClemson

56.5MMH Power Index59.9

111.8Offensive Efficiency112.6

104.8Defensive Efficiency101.4

7.0Net Efficiency11.2

2.8Strength of Schedule4.6

1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

69.9Tempo63.6

52.6%Effective FG%53.0%

14.9%Turnover Rate14.0%

26.6%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

36.8%Free Throw Rate38.1%

4.9Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY70.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–56.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–111.8), defensive efficiency (101.4–104.8), net efficiency (11.2–7.0).

California COUNTERS WITHrecent form (1.8–-4.7).

Final

California

68—80

Clemson

Clemson by 12 • 61.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CaliforniaTEAM STATClemson

26-57FG31-50

46.0%FG%62.0%

6-173PT8-18

35.0%3PT%44.0%

10-16FT10-12

63.0%FT%83.0%

22Rebounds32

9Offensive Rebounds7

6Assists18

6Turnovers12

5Steals5

—Blocks3

14Fouls16

Player Box Score

California

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Andrej Stojakovic	G	35	11-15	1-1	7-9	2	1	1	30
Jovan Blacksher Jr.	Guard	31	6-12	3-6	0-0	2	1	0	15
Jeremiah Wilkinson	G	22	4-7	1-3	2-3	2	1	0	11
DeJuan Campbell	G	27	3-7	0-1	0-0	2	1	2	6
Rytis Petraitis	F	31	1-8	1-5	1-2	5	2	1	4
Mady Sissoko	Center	28	1-4	0-0	0-2	5	0	1	2
Lee Dort	F	12	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0
Joshua Ola-Joseph	F	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0
Christian Tucker	Guard	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	38	8-10	1-1	4-6	7	2	0	0	21
Chase Hunter	Guard	36	8-12	1-3	2-2	5	6	2	1	19
Chauncey Wiggins	F	24	7-10	1-3	0-0	4	2	0	0	15
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	35	2-8	1-4	2-2	4	4	0	0	7
Del Jones	G	13	2-4	2-3	0-0	3	0	0	0	6
Dillon Hunter	G	24	2-4	1-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	5
Christian Reeves	C	8	1-1	0-0	2-2	3	0	1	0	4
Jake Heidbreder	G	6	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Viktor Lakhin	Center	14	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	2	2	2	0
Myles Foster	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.2Possessions61.2

111.1Offensive Efficiency130.7

130.7Defensive Efficiency111.1

-19.6Net Efficiency19.6

50.9%Effective FG%70.0%

52.6%True Shooting %71.8%

9.7%Turnover Rate19.8%

28.1%Free Throw Rate24.0%

29.8%3-Point Rate36.0%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Clemson won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 61.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.