Mississippi Valley State

3-30

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.7%Mississippi Valley State

96.3%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -22.8

PROJECTED TOTAL146.9

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -2603

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 62

Projected Total146.9

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 85

Team Comparison

Mississippi Valley StateMetricAlabama A&M

17.7MMH Power Index42.3

91.1Offensive Efficiency105.9

117.8Defensive Efficiency106.6

-26.7Net Efficiency-0.7

-4.1Strength of Schedule-6.8

-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

70.5Tempo68.0

45.8%Effective FG%49.7%

21.8%Turnover Rate16.8%

26.5%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

34.5%Free Throw Rate45.7%

-18.8Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–17.7), offensive efficiency (105.9–91.1), defensive efficiency (106.6–117.8), net efficiency (-0.7–-26.7).

Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.1–-6.8).

Final

Mississippi Valley State

67—79

Alabama A&M

Alabama A&M by 12 • 71.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Mississippi Valley StateTEAM STATAlabama A&M

24-59FG30-66

41.0%FG%45.0%

7-233PT7-27

30.0%3PT%26.0%

12-18FT12-17

67.0%FT%71.0%

26Rebounds49

8Offensive Rebounds21

11Assists18

12Turnovers18

8Steals5

2Blocks6

14Fouls17

Player Box Score

Mississippi Valley State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Arthur Tate	Guard	30	7-14	2-7	1-2	6	0	1	0	17
Kendal Parker	G	21	2-8	0-4	5-6	3	2	0	1	9
Jair Horton	F	20	3-6	1-3	2-2	3	1	1	0	9
George Ivory III	G	11	3-4	2-3	0-1	1	0	1	0	8
Donovan Sanders	Guard	27	3-7	0-1	1-3	3	2	1	0	7
Antonio Sisk	G	25	3-9	1-3	0-0	1	2	2	0	7
Greg Moore Jr.	G	14	1-3	1-1	2-2	0	0	0	0	5
Jonathan Pace	F	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Raeshun McGregory	Guard	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	1	2
Alvin Stredic	Forward	33	0-5	0-0	1-2	3	4	0	0	1
Markell Petro	Guard	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Daniel Umoh	Center	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	26	4-9	2-6	3-5	9	1	0	1	13
Darius Ford	Guard	16	4-8	3-7	0-0	2	1	0	0	11
AC Bryant	G	28	5-10	0-3	0-0	7	5	1	0	10
Chad Moodie	F	28	3-7	0-1	3-4	3	2	1	2	9
London Riley	Guard	15	2-5	2-5	3-3	2	1	1	0	9
Saliou Seye	F	20	3-5	0-1	1-2	9	1	1	1	7
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	20	3-7	0-1	1-1	2	5	0	0	7
Bol Kuir	Forward	5	2-2	0-0	1-1	3	1	0	0	5
Clance Crosby	F	6	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Quincy McGriff	Guard	16	1-7	0-2	0-0	5	1	0	2	2
Warren Yeh	Guard	4	1-2	0-1	0-1	0	0	0	0	2
Aaron Smith	Guard	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	0
Angok Anyang	F	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jaylen Colon	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.4Possessions71.4

93.8Offensive Efficiency110.6

110.6Defensive Efficiency93.8

-16.8Net Efficiency16.8

46.6%Effective FG%50.8%

49.6%True Shooting %53.3%

16.8%Turnover Rate25.3%

30.5%Free Throw Rate25.8%

39.0%3-Point Rate40.9%

0.92Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 71.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.