Tulane logo

Tulane

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.9%Tulane
87.1%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -13.6
PROJECTED TOTAL152.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -675
UAB logo

UAB

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 69
Projected Total152.6
Projected ScoreUAB 83

Team Comparison

TulaneMetricUAB
44.3MMH Power Index56.9
105.3Offensive Efficiency110.5
109.9Defensive Efficiency102.9
-4.6Net Efficiency7.6
2.7Strength of Schedule0.4
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
68.7Tempo71.7
49.6%Effective FG%48.8%
15.6%Turnover Rate12.4%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
44.8%Free Throw Rate36.9%
-3.2Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.9), net efficiency (7.6–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–0.4), shooting efficiency (49.6–48.8), free throw rate (44.8–36.9).
Final
Tulane logo
Tulane
69—81
UAB logo
UAB
UAB by 12 • 70.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulaneTEAM STATUAB
26-53FG32-67
49.0%FG%48.0%
5-163PT9-25
31.0%3PT%36.0%
12-17FT8-12
71.0%FT%67.0%
29Rebounds37
5Offensive Rebounds13
13Assists20
14Turnovers11
7Steals12
2Blocks2
15Fouls14

Player Box Score

Tulane
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kaleb BanksF376-111-43-5120110016
Asher WoodsG345-102-54-602000016
Gregg Glenn IIIF306-110-01-154200013
Rowan BrumbaughG334-121-42-235100011
KJ GreeneG104-50-01-11000009
Kam WilliamsG361-31-20-05231003
Mari JordanG100-10-11-22000001
Percy DanielsC80-00-00-00000000
Spencer ElliottF20-00-00-00000000
UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Yaxel LendeborgF3611-131-12-3138220025
Tony ToneyGuard365-115-110-042000015
Butta JohnsonG334-111-32-233300011
Ja'Borri McGheeG244-70-23-332400011
Christian ColemanG294-100-01-45020009
Tyren MooreG212-62-60-01510006
Alejandro VasquezGuard92-60-20-01000004
Bradley EzewiroForward120-30-00-04000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.4Possessions70.4
98.0Offensive Efficiency115.1
115.1Defensive Efficiency98.0
-17.0Net Efficiency17.0
53.8%Effective FG%54.5%
56.5%True Shooting %55.7%
20.0%Turnover Rate15.6%
32.1%Free Throw Rate17.9%
30.2%3-Point Rate37.3%
0.93Assist / Turnover1.82
Game Summary
UAB won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 70.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.