Loyola Maryland logo

Loyola Maryland

12-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
48.4%Loyola Maryland
51.6%Army
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADArmy -1.2
PROJECTED TOTAL153.1
MODEL MONEYLINEArmy -107
Army logo

Army

11-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLoyola Maryland 76
Projected Total153.1
Projected ScoreArmy 77

Team Comparison

40.8MMH Power Index36.8
108.1Offensive Efficiency104.8
110.7Defensive Efficiency112.1
-2.6Net Efficiency-7.3
-5.0Strength of Schedule-3.3
-5.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.6
69.6Tempo68.9
51.2%Effective FG%49.8%
15.7%Turnover Rate17.3%
29.4%Offensive Rebound %31.0%
31.0%Free Throw Rate26.5%
-1.8Average Margin-5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Loyola Maryland HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLoyola Maryland holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (40.8–36.8), offensive efficiency (108.1–104.8), defensive efficiency (110.7–112.1), net efficiency (-2.6–-7.3).
Army COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.3–-5.0), offensive rebounding (31.0–29.4).
Final
Loyola Maryland logo
Loyola Maryland
72—74
Army logo
Army
Army by 2 • 64.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Loyola MarylandTEAM STATArmy
29-55FG32-61
53.0%FG%52.0%
5-183PT7-18
28.0%3PT%39.0%
9-16FT3-8
56.0%FT%38.0%
36Rebounds27
11Offensive Rebounds8
15Assists17
13Turnovers8
5Steals9
4Blocks3
13Fouls17

Player Box Score

Loyola Maryland
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jordan StiemkeG296-143-92-212120017
Tyson CommanderG347-102-40-011000016
Milos IlicC286-80-00-1103300012
Jacob TheodosiouG303-70-25-672000011
Braeden SpeedG324-90-21-23310009
David Brown IIIGuard202-20-00-03100004
Veljko IlicF141-30-01-56101003
Troy Cicero Jr.G130-20-10-00201000
Army
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jalen RuckerGuard3612-172-30-132310026
AJ AllenspachForward255-100-02-571000012
Josh ScovensG194-90-21-11330009
Jorn EversonF73-61-40-10210007
Isaiah CaldwellGuard202-21-10-02101005
Kevin McCarthyG102-31-20-00210005
Jacen HollowayF202-30-00-03000004
Ryan CurryG281-61-40-01310003
Blake BarkerGuard141-31-10-01000003
Kendall HaileyGuard140-10-10-02100000
Tate LaczkowskiF70-10-00-00201000

Advanced Game Stats

64.7Possessions64.7
111.3Offensive Efficiency114.4
114.4Defensive Efficiency111.3
-3.1Net Efficiency3.1
57.3%Effective FG%58.2%
57.5%True Shooting %57.1%
20.1%Turnover Rate12.3%
29.1%Free Throw Rate13.1%
32.7%3-Point Rate29.5%
1.15Assist / Turnover2.13
Game Summary
Army won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 64.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.