Queens University logo

Queens University

21-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
47.9%Queens University
52.1%Lipscomb
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLipscomb -2.8
PROJECTED TOTAL163.5
MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -109
Lipscomb logo

Lipscomb

18-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 80
Projected Total163.5
Projected ScoreLipscomb 83

Team Comparison

51.7MMH Power Index47.9
118.4Offensive Efficiency111.3
117.0Defensive Efficiency107.6
1.4Net Efficiency3.7
0.1Strength of Schedule-2.5
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
71.4Tempo68.8
56.6%Effective FG%54.8%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.0%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %25.9%
37.6%Free Throw Rate26.5%
0.9Average Margin2.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–47.9), offensive efficiency (118.4–111.3), strength of schedule (0.1–-2.5), recent form (1.5–-1.0).
Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–117.0), net efficiency (3.7–1.4), average scoring margin (2.5–0.9).
Final
Queens University logo
Queens University
75—73
Lipscomb logo
Lipscomb
Queens University by 2 • 63.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATLipscomb
27-62FG26-55
44.0%FG%47.0%
10-253PT8-21
40.0%3PT%38.0%
11-17FT13-16
65.0%FT%81.0%
41Rebounds27
18Offensive Rebounds8
14Assists13
11Turnovers9
5Steals4
6Blocks3
16Fouls15

Player Box Score

Queens University
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chris AshbyG336-126-112-311010020
Kalib MathewsGuard284-70-15-673200013
Jaxon PollardF195-111-32-452000013
Nasir MannG204-72-32-222110012
Yoav BermanG144-81-40-03021009
Bryce CashGuard262-40-00-09200004
Leo ColimerioForward321-80-20-24300002
Maban JabrielF61-20-10-02000002
Malcolm WilsonForward220-30-00-02103000
Lipscomb
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Gyasi PowellGuard326-134-60-020100016
Jacob OgnacevicF355-91-34-431000015
Dylan FaulknerF226-60-03-483030015
Joe AndersonGuard333-81-62-21410009
Will PruittGuard333-100-22-33110008
Charlie WilliamsC102-62-30-02010006
Miles WhiteG91-10-00-02000002
Logan SuberG70-10-02-31100002
Kellan BoylanF100-00-00-02100000
Grant AsmanF90-10-10-00200000

Advanced Game Stats

63.4Possessions63.4
118.3Offensive Efficiency115.1
115.1Defensive Efficiency118.3
3.2Net Efficiency-3.2
51.6%Effective FG%54.5%
53.5%True Shooting %58.3%
17.4%Turnover Rate14.2%
27.4%Free Throw Rate29.1%
40.3%3-Point Rate38.2%
1.27Assist / Turnover1.44
Game Summary
Queens University won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 63.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.