Siena

23-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.1%Siena

54.9%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -2.3

PROJECTED TOTAL141.7

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -122

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSiena 70

Projected Total141.7

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 72

Team Comparison

SienaMetricQuinnipiac

53.8MMH Power Index51

109.2Offensive Efficiency106.8

102.2Defensive Efficiency102.1

7.0Net Efficiency4.7

-0.5Strength of Schedule-2.3

3.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

64.4Tempo70.5

50.7%Effective FG%48.9%

15.8%Turnover Rate15.6%

31.4%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

34.9%Free Throw Rate34.1%

4.5Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Siena HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSiena holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–51.0), offensive efficiency (109.2–106.8), net efficiency (7.0–4.7), strength of schedule (-0.5–-2.3).

Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.1–102.2), ball security (15.6–15.8), offensive rebounding (34.1–31.4).

Final

Siena

53—72

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac by 19 • 71.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SienaTEAM STATQuinnipiac

19-64FG28-59

30.0%FG%47.0%

7-243PT5-17

29.0%3PT%29.0%

8-15FT11-13

53.0%FT%85.0%

25Rebounds42

7Offensive Rebounds9

9Assists13

11Turnovers11

7Steals9

6Blocks9

12Fouls17

Player Box Score

Siena

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Justice Shoats	G	37	6-13	0-1	5-6	3	5	3	1	17
Major Freeman	G	37	5-15	5-9	1-2	6	1	0	0	16
Gavin Doty	G	38	3-10	0-2	0-0	6	3	1	0	6
Peter Carey	Center	16	2-3	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	1	5
Brendan Coyle	F	36	1-10	1-9	0-0	4	0	1	0	3
Devin Brafford	F	1	1-1	1-1	0-1	0	0	0	0	3
Tajae Jones	F	11	1-4	0-0	0-2	1	0	0	1	2
Myles Wilmoth	F	13	0-5	0-1	1-2	4	0	2	2	1
Reid Ducharme	G	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Chris Torres	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Kyle Winters	Guard	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amarri Monroe	F	34	7-14	0-2	2-2	10	1	4	0	16
Khaden Bennett	G	32	4-14	2-6	4-5	5	2	1	1	14
Jaden Zimmerman	G	36	4-6	2-3	3-4	6	3	1	0	13
Paul Otieno	F	31	5-7	0-1	2-2	10	1	1	5	12
Savion Lewis	Guard	18	3-6	0-0	0-0	2	4	0	0	6
Grant Randall	F	17	3-5	0-2	0-0	6	1	1	0	6
Alexis Reyes	Forward	16	1-4	1-2	0-0	2	1	1	1	3
Richie Springs	Forward	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	2
Ryan Mabrey	G	8	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Akintola Akinniyi	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Quinn Guth	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.2Possessions71.2

74.4Offensive Efficiency101.1

101.1Defensive Efficiency74.4

-26.7Net Efficiency26.7

35.2%Effective FG%51.7%

37.3%True Shooting %55.2%

14.6%Turnover Rate16.4%

23.4%Free Throw Rate22.0%

37.5%3-Point Rate28.8%

0.82Assist / Turnover1.18

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 71.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.