
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.0%Rider
74.0%Canisius
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCanisius -8.3
PROJECTED TOTAL135.1
MODEL MONEYLINECanisius -285

Canisius
10-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 63
Projected Total135.1
Projected ScoreCanisius 72
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index33.9
96.3Offensive Efficiency97.1
115.3Defensive Efficiency108.8
-19.0Net Efficiency-11.7
-0.9Strength of Schedule-1.8
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.0
65.9Tempo64.8
43.4%Effective FG%46.8%
17.1%Turnover Rate19.6%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
31.5%Free Throw Rate32.4%
-12.6Average Margin-7.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Canisius HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCanisius holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (33.9–29.1), offensive efficiency (97.1–96.3), defensive efficiency (108.8–115.3), net efficiency (-11.7–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.9–-1.8), ball security (17.1–19.6), offensive rebounding (32.8–29.1).