Princeton

9-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

17.9%Princeton

82.1%Harvard

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -10.9

PROJECTED TOTAL137.8

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -459

Harvard

17-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePrinceton 63

Projected Total137.8

Projected ScoreHarvard 74

Team Comparison

PrincetonMetricHarvard

43.5MMH Power Index52.6

105.1Offensive Efficiency108.1

110.3Defensive Efficiency102.9

-5.2Net Efficiency5.2

1.7Strength of Schedule-0.1

-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3

65.2Tempo64.8

50.3%Effective FG%53.4%

16.9%Turnover Rate17.2%

27.5%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

35.0%Free Throw Rate27.9%

-3.4Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–43.5), offensive efficiency (108.1–105.1), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.3), net efficiency (5.2–-5.2).

Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-0.1), ball security (16.9–17.2), offensive rebounding (27.5–26.3).

Final

Princeton

68—64

Harvard

Princeton by 4 • 63.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PrincetonTEAM STATHarvard

24-55FG21-50

44.0%FG%42.0%

7-213PT9-22

33.0%3PT%41.0%

13-18FT13-16

72.0%FT%81.0%

37Rebounds30

10Offensive Rebounds4

13Assists9

10Turnovers9

5Steals8

2Blocks2

13Fouls15

Player Box Score

Princeton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Xaivian Lee	G	31	8-13	3-5	3-5	3	2	0	0	22
Caden Pierce	Forward	37	4-7	0-2	1-3	8	4	1	0	9
Dalen Davis	G	36	2-12	1-5	4-4	4	3	3	0	9
Jackson Hicke	G	17	2-6	0-0	4-4	5	2	0	1	8
Philip Byriel	Forward	27	3-6	1-2	0-0	6	0	1	0	7
Malik Abdullahi	F	13	3-4	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	1	7
Blake Peters	Guard	29	2-6	2-6	0-0	3	1	0	0	6
Jack Scott	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
CJ Happy	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Jack Stanton	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chandler Pigge	G	37	6-13	3-6	0-0	12	1	3	0	15
Robert Hinton	G	34	4-11	0-1	6-8	6	2	2	0	14
Thomas Batties III	F	39	4-7	1-2	4-4	4	1	0	1	13
Louis Lesmond	G	29	3-7	3-5	3-4	1	2	1	1	12
Evan Nelson	G	29	2-6	2-5	0-0	5	3	1	0	6
Austin Hunt	G	20	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Ben Eisendrath	G	3	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Tey Barbour	G	9	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.1Possessions63.1

107.8Offensive Efficiency101.4

101.4Defensive Efficiency107.8

6.3Net Efficiency-6.3

50.0%Effective FG%51.0%

53.5%True Shooting %55.6%

15.7%Turnover Rate14.4%

32.7%Free Throw Rate32.0%

38.2%3-Point Rate44.0%

1.30Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Princeton won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 63.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.