UT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.0%UT Rio Grande Valley
43.0%Texas A&M-Corpus Christi
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -0.3
PROJECTED TOTAL143.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -133
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi logo

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

18-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 72
Projected Total143.0
Projected ScoreTexas A&M-Corpus Christi 71

Team Comparison

55.8MMH Power Index48.7
112.6Offensive Efficiency105.9
103.1Defensive Efficiency98.9
9.5Net Efficiency7.0
-1.9Strength of Schedule-5.9
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
67.4Tempo68.4
55.7%Effective FG%51.6%
17.9%Turnover Rate19.3%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %33.3%
29.6%Free Throw Rate39.9%
6.4Average Margin4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–48.7), offensive efficiency (112.6–105.9), net efficiency (9.5–7.0), strength of schedule (-1.9–-5.9).
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.9–103.1), offensive rebounding (33.3–29.2), free throw rate (39.9–29.6).
Final
UT Rio Grande Valley logo
UT Rio Grande Valley
74—79
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi logo
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi by 5 • 63.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATTexas A&M-Corpus Christi
30-58FG30-60
52.0%FG%50.0%
10-283PT7-18
36.0%3PT%39.0%
4-14FT12-15
29.0%FT%80.0%
32Rebounds30
11Offensive Rebounds9
16Assists16
11Turnovers5
1Steals7
5Blocks2
15Fouls15

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Hasan Abdul HakimG378-163-81-465140020
Trey MillerG297-111-31-424000016
DK ThornGuard326-103-50-240000015
Howie Fleming Jr.G325-61-11-282000012
Cliff DavisG282-61-50-02300005
Marshal DestremauF171-50-41-25200003
Tommy GankhuyagForward71-11-10-00000003
Kwo AgwaF120-10-00-01001000
RJ NanceGuard40-10-00-00000000
K.T. RaimeyGuard20-10-10-00000000
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Isaac Williams IVG338-130-22-343120018
Jaden WalkerGuard255-82-20-017100012
Garry ClarkF354-120-23-4152000011
Damarion DennisG244-73-40-011100011
Owen DeaseF131-40-26-64000008
Stephen GiwaC203-50-00-02110006
Sheldon WilliamsF162-30-01-20010005
Jordan RobertsGuard131-41-40-00210003
Kam ParkerG81-21-20-01010003
Dian Wright-FordeG131-20-00-00000002

Advanced Game Stats

63.9Possessions63.9
115.8Offensive Efficiency123.6
123.6Defensive Efficiency115.8
-7.8Net Efficiency7.8
60.3%Effective FG%55.8%
57.2%True Shooting %58.8%
17.0%Turnover Rate7.9%
24.1%Free Throw Rate25.0%
48.3%3-Point Rate30.0%
1.45Assist / Turnover3.20
Game Summary
Texas A&M-Corpus Christi won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 63.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.