UT Martin

22-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.6%UT Martin

54.4%Lindenwood

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLindenwood -1.8

PROJECTED TOTAL141.5

MODEL MONEYLINELindenwood -119

Lindenwood

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Martin 70

Projected Total141.5

Projected ScoreLindenwood 72

Team Comparison

UT MartinMetricLindenwood

49.8MMH Power Index46.8

103.8Offensive Efficiency105.5

94.0Defensive Efficiency98.6

9.8Net Efficiency6.9

-4.8Strength of Schedule-6.8

-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.4

67.2Tempo73.7

49.5%Effective FG%50.2%

21.4%Turnover Rate18.3%

37.9%Offensive Rebound %34.0%

37.5%Free Throw Rate37.9%

6.6Average Margin5.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–46.8), defensive efficiency (94.0–98.6), net efficiency (9.8–6.9), strength of schedule (-4.8–-6.8).

Lindenwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.5–103.8), shooting efficiency (50.2–49.5), ball security (18.3–21.4).

Final

UT Martin

81—82

Lindenwood

Lindenwood by 1 • 69.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT MartinTEAM STATLindenwood

27-59FG31-62

46.0%FG%50.0%

14-313PT10-29

45.0%3PT%34.0%

13-26FT10-13

50.0%FT%77.0%

34Rebounds33

15Offensive Rebounds12

12Assists14

12Turnovers14

11Steals6

3Blocks5

16Fouls20

Player Box Score

UT Martin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tarence Guinyard	G	28	5-9	1-5	7-9	2	1	3	0	18
Vlad Salaridze	F	33	6-10	2-3	0-2	13	3	2	1	14
Afan Trnka	G	24	5-11	2-6	2-6	2	2	3	0	14
Josue Grullon	G	15	5-11	4-7	0-0	3	0	0	0	14
Matija Žužic	G	30	3-4	3-4	1-2	1	0	0	1	10
Carlos Cortijo	Guard	29	2-9	1-4	1-2	1	4	1	0	6
Andrija Bukumirovic	F	11	1-3	1-1	0-3	5	0	0	1	3
Filip Radakovic	G	28	0-2	0-1	2-2	5	2	2	0	2
AJ Hopkins	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Lindenwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Anias Futrell	G	39	9-17	6-13	2-3	10	1	1	3	26
Markeith Browning II	Not Available	30	7-15	0-6	4-4	5	6	1	0	18
Jadis Jones	G	34	4-7	0-0	3-5	1	0	1	0	11
Aly Tounkara	F	23	4-5	0-0	1-1	6	0	0	1	9
Nathan Johnson Jr.	Guard	24	3-4	2-3	0-0	1	1	2	0	8
Clayton Jackson	G	20	2-6	1-2	0-0	2	3	1	0	5
Jalen Bouknight	G	14	2-6	1-4	0-0	3	1	0	1	5
Colin Ruffin	G	16	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	2	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.3Possessions69.3

116.9Offensive Efficiency118.3

118.3Defensive Efficiency116.9

-1.4Net Efficiency1.4

57.6%Effective FG%58.1%

56.8%True Shooting %60.1%

17.6%Turnover Rate20.0%

44.1%Free Throw Rate21.0%

52.5%3-Point Rate46.8%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Lindenwood won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 69.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.