Wake Forest logo

Wake Forest

18-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.0%Wake Forest
80.0%Miami
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiami -10.8
PROJECTED TOTAL157.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMiami -400
Miami logo

Miami

26-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWake Forest 73
Projected Total157.4
Projected ScoreMiami 84

Team Comparison

57.6MMH Power Index65.5
112.4Offensive Efficiency117.8
109.7Defensive Efficiency103.0
2.7Net Efficiency14.8
7.2Strength of Schedule3.6
-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency3.6
70.2Tempo69.2
52.8%Effective FG%55.5%
15.5%Turnover Rate16.2%
30.0%Offensive Rebound %37.3%
36.1%Free Throw Rate37.9%
1.9Average Margin10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Miami HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.5–57.6), offensive efficiency (117.8–112.4), defensive efficiency (103.0–109.7), net efficiency (14.8–2.7).
Wake Forest COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.2–3.6), ball security (15.5–16.2).
Final
Wake Forest logo
Wake Forest
88—78
Miami logo
Miami
Wake Forest by 10 • 69.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Wake ForestTEAM STATMiami
35-64FG25-62
55.0%FG%40.0%
8-233PT11-35
35.0%3PT%31.0%
10-12FT17-21
83.0%FT%81.0%
30Rebounds39
9Offensive Rebounds17
13Assists17
9Turnovers14
9Steals7
3Blocks5
17Fouls15

Player Box Score

Wake Forest
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cameron HildrethGuard3811-166-83-432200031
Hunter SallisGuard368-151-55-543100022
Tre'Von SpillersF328-110-01-151100017
Efton Reid IIIForward355-90-10-051120010
Ty-Laur JohnsonG272-51-20-02631005
Juke HarrisG191-50-41-24010003
Parker FriedrichsenG130-30-30-01000000
Miami
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Matthew ClevelandGuard358-131-25-543020022
Jalil BetheaG255-102-71-234110013
Austin SwartzG314-104-90-021110012
Paul DjobetG243-82-43-441200011
AJ Staton-McCrayG252-62-64-445100010
Lynn KiddCenter242-40-03-47200007
Brandon JohnsonForward261-80-51-213110003
Jalen BlackmonGuard100-30-20-00011000

Advanced Game Stats

69.4Possessions69.4
126.8Offensive Efficiency112.4
112.4Defensive Efficiency126.8
14.4Net Efficiency-14.4
60.9%Effective FG%49.2%
63.1%True Shooting %54.2%
12.9%Turnover Rate20.3%
18.8%Free Throw Rate33.9%
35.9%3-Point Rate56.5%
1.44Assist / Turnover1.21
Game Summary
Wake Forest won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 69.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.