Loyola Marymount
15-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.9%Loyola Marymount
31.1%Pepperdine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLoyola Marymount -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL150.8
MODEL MONEYLINELoyola Marymount -222
Pepperdine
9-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLoyola Marymount 78
Projected Total150.8
Projected ScorePepperdine 73
Team Comparison
49.9MMH Power Index38.2
107.0Offensive Efficiency103.2
103.8Defensive Efficiency113.6
3.2Net Efficiency-10.4
0.5Strength of Schedule0.7
-1.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
69.4Tempo70.0
52.8%Effective FG%48.7%
17.2%Turnover Rate18.3%
27.3%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
32.1%Free Throw Rate34.0%
2.2Average Margin-7.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Loyola Marymount HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLoyola Marymount holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.9–38.2), offensive efficiency (107.0–103.2), defensive efficiency (103.8–113.6), net efficiency (3.2–-10.4).
Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–0.5), offensive rebounding (31.1–27.3), free throw rate (34.0–32.1).