
Rider
4-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.2%Rider
77.8%Niagara
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNiagara -9.2
PROJECTED TOTAL136.2
MODEL MONEYLINENiagara -350

Niagara
8-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 63
Projected Total136.2
Projected ScoreNiagara 73
Team Comparison
29.1MMH Power Index35.8
96.3Offensive Efficiency100.8
115.3Defensive Efficiency112.4
-19.0Net Efficiency-11.6
-0.9Strength of Schedule-0.8
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.6
65.9Tempo63.4
43.4%Effective FG%50.9%
17.1%Turnover Rate18.8%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %24.9%
31.5%Free Throw Rate27.3%
-12.6Average Margin-7.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Niagara HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNiagara holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (35.8–29.1), offensive efficiency (100.8–96.3), defensive efficiency (112.4–115.3), net efficiency (-11.6–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHball security (17.1–18.8), offensive rebounding (32.8–24.9), free throw rate (31.5–27.3).