Stonehill logo

Stonehill

12-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
42.3%Stonehill
57.7%Chicago State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADChicago State -0.8
PROJECTED TOTAL137.7
MODEL MONEYLINEChicago State -136
Chicago State logo

Chicago State

7-25
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 68
Projected Total137.7
Projected ScoreChicago State 69

Team Comparison

37.9MMH Power Index36.1
97.5Offensive Efficiency99.4
100.7Defensive Efficiency114.9
-3.2Net Efficiency-15.5
-5.4Strength of Schedule0.5
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
68.1Tempo66.2
48.0%Effective FG%45.6%
19.1%Turnover Rate15.8%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
29.2%Free Throw Rate30.7%
-2.2Average Margin-10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Stonehill HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStonehill holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (37.9–36.1), defensive efficiency (100.7–114.9), net efficiency (-3.2–-15.5), recent form (-3.4–-4.3).
Chicago State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (99.4–97.5), strength of schedule (0.5–-5.4), ball security (15.8–19.1).
Final
Stonehill logo
Stonehill
68—52
Chicago State logo
Chicago State
Stonehill by 16 • 62.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StonehillTEAM STATChicago State
21-47FG15-47
45.0%FG%32.0%
9-263PT2-14
35.0%3PT%14.0%
17-27FT20-25
63.0%FT%80.0%
31Rebounds27
9Offensive Rebounds8
18Assists5
11Turnovers13
5Steals7
1Blocks4
19Fouls20

Player Box Score

Stonehill
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Hermann KoffiG397-104-60-024010018
Louie SemonaF341-50-49-1361000011
Ethan MeuserF174-63-50-042100011
Chas StinsonG271-40-06-125520008
Amir NesbittGuard193-92-70-02200008
Todd BrognaF333-70-00-06310006
Christopher MelisForward152-30-10-01000004
Josh MorganGuard160-30-32-21110002
Chicago State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Noble CrawfordForward345-100-25-651200015
Saxby SunderlandGuard252-30-06-711000010
Cameron JerniganForward213-60-01-26022007
Troy McKoy Jr.Guard211-51-23-42220006
Jalen ForrestG301-80-43-44110005
Dailliss CoxF172-50-00-04000004
Matthew RobinsonGuard371-51-40-01002003
Quincy AllenG130-40-22-20000002
CJ DelancyF20-10-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

62.9Possessions62.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency82.7
82.7Defensive Efficiency108.1
25.4Net Efficiency-25.4
54.3%Effective FG%34.0%
56.8%True Shooting %44.2%
17.8%Turnover Rate20.4%
57.4%Free Throw Rate53.2%
55.3%3-Point Rate29.8%
1.64Assist / Turnover0.38
Game Summary
Stonehill won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 62.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.