
UAB
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.0%UAB
48.0%Florida Atlantic
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFlorida Atlantic -0.9
PROJECTED TOTAL155.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -108

Florida Atlantic
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 77
Projected Total155.8
Projected ScoreFlorida Atlantic 78
Team Comparison
56.9MMH Power Index51.6
110.5Offensive Efficiency110.5
102.9Defensive Efficiency104.4
7.6Net Efficiency6.1
0.4Strength of Schedule-0.9
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.6
71.7Tempo71.2
48.8%Effective FG%52.5%
12.4%Turnover Rate17.3%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %32.9%
36.9%Free Throw Rate33.9%
5.4Average Margin4.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–51.6), defensive efficiency (102.9–104.4), net efficiency (7.6–6.1), strength of schedule (0.4–-0.9).
Florida Atlantic COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.5–48.8), offensive rebounding (32.9–32.7).