UTSA

5-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.6%UTSA

89.4%Rice

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRice -15.2

PROJECTED TOTAL151.3

MODEL MONEYLINERice -843

Rice

13-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 68

Projected Total151.3

Projected ScoreRice 83

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricRice

30.5MMH Power Index45.1

99.0Offensive Efficiency108.3

115.0Defensive Efficiency109.2

-16.0Net Efficiency-0.9

-1.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3

70.2Tempo68.3

45.9%Effective FG%49.7%

17.0%Turnover Rate17.8%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %35.7%

29.9%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-11.3Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–30.5), offensive efficiency (108.3–99.0), defensive efficiency (109.2–115.0), net efficiency (-0.9–-16.0).

UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.2), ball security (17.0–17.8).

Final

UTSA

90—84

Rice

UTSA by 6 • 70.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATRice

30-65FG26-50

46.0%FG%52.0%

13-313PT10-26

42.0%3PT%38.0%

17-18FT22-30

94.0%FT%73.0%

28Rebounds36

9Offensive Rebounds9

17Assists18

6Turnovers16

11Steals2

1Blocks4

25Fouls20

Player Box Score

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Primo Spears	Guard	39	8-20	2-7	8-8	0	5	0	1	26
Marcus Millender	G	33	9-13	5-6	2-2	0	3	4	0	25
Raekwon Horton	Forward	39	5-9	3-5	7-8	8	5	2	0	20
Damari Monsanto	Guard	19	3-9	3-8	0-0	5	1	3	0	9
Jonnivius Smith	Forward	24	3-6	0-0	0-0	7	1	0	0	6
Tai'Reon Joseph	G	15	1-7	0-5	0-0	0	0	2	0	2
David Hermes	F	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Baboucarr Njie	F	20	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	0
Nazar Mahmoud	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Rice

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trae Broadnax	G	36	5-10	1-2	8-8	6	6	0	0	19
Alem Huseinovic	Guard	29	3-9	2-7	4-4	2	1	0	0	12
Jacob Dar	G	23	3-7	2-5	3-5	6	0	0	2	11
Caden Powell	C	16	4-4	0-0	3-4	4	1	1	0	11
Denver Anglin	G	26	3-8	3-8	0-2	3	3	0	0	9
Kellen Amos	Guard	20	2-3	0-0	3-5	2	5	1	0	7
Andrew Akuchie	F	20	3-4	0-0	0-0	6	1	0	0	6
Emory Lanier	Guard	14	2-4	2-4	0-0	2	1	0	1	6
Jimmy Oladokun Jr.	F	16	1-1	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	1	3

Advanced Game Stats

70.9Possessions70.9

126.9Offensive Efficiency118.5

118.5Defensive Efficiency126.9

8.5Net Efficiency-8.5

56.2%Effective FG%62.0%

61.2%True Shooting %65.4%

8.5%Turnover Rate22.5%

27.7%Free Throw Rate60.0%

47.7%3-Point Rate52.0%

2.83Assist / Turnover1.13

Game Summary

UTSA won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 70.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.