South Carolina

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.7%South Carolina

94.3%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -19.2

PROJECTED TOTAL159.5

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -1654

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSouth Carolina 70

Projected Total159.5

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 89

Team Comparison

South CarolinaMetricVanderbilt

48.2MMH Power Index68.9

109.0Offensive Efficiency120.9

111.2Defensive Efficiency105.7

-2.2Net Efficiency15.2

5.2Strength of Schedule7.4

-15.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

68.8Tempo70.9

50.4%Effective FG%55.3%

14.5%Turnover Rate13.5%

27.5%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

37.1%Free Throw Rate39.3%

-1.5Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–48.2), offensive efficiency (120.9–109.0), defensive efficiency (105.7–111.2), net efficiency (15.2–-2.2).

Final

South Carolina

63—66

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 3 • 70.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

South CarolinaTEAM STATVanderbilt

19-45FG23-56

42.0%FG%41.0%

7-163PT4-21

44.0%3PT%19.0%

18-23FT16-21

78.0%FT%76.0%

37Rebounds25

10Offensive Rebounds8

10Assists12

25Turnovers12

7Steals15

2Blocks5

18Fouls18

Player Box Score

South Carolina

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Morris Ugusuk	G	28	6-8	3-4	5-6	2	2	3	0	20
Collin Murray-Boyles	Forward	35	6-10	0-0	2-4	9	0	2	2	14
Arden Conyers	F	26	3-8	2-6	2-2	1	1	0	0	10
Jacobi Wright	Guard	33	1-6	0-2	6-6	10	2	1	0	8
Cam Scott	G	13	2-5	1-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	5
Zach Davis	G	28	1-5	1-2	0-0	6	2	0	0	3
Nick Pringle	F	23	0-2	0-0	3-4	3	1	0	0	3
Benjamin Bosmans-Verdonk	Forward	14	0-1	0-0	0-1	2	1	1	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AJ Hoggard	Guard	31	4-9	1-4	5-6	4	4	3	0	14
Jason Edwards	G	25	3-8	2-3	5-6	0	1	1	0	13
Devin McGlockton	F	30	5-7	0-1	1-1	7	0	1	1	11
MJ Collins Jr.	G	27	3-8	1-4	2-2	3	0	2	0	9
Tyler Nickel	F	26	2-8	0-4	2-2	1	2	0	1	6
Jaylen Carey	F	17	3-8	0-2	0-0	2	0	1	1	6
Tyler Tanner	G	21	2-5	0-3	0-2	2	3	3	0	4
Chris Manon	Guard	23	1-3	0-0	1-2	2	2	4	2	3

Advanced Game Stats

70.5Possessions70.5

89.4Offensive Efficiency93.6

93.6Defensive Efficiency89.4

-4.3Net Efficiency4.3

50.0%Effective FG%44.6%

56.3%True Shooting %50.0%

35.2%Turnover Rate17.1%

51.1%Free Throw Rate37.5%

35.6%3-Point Rate37.5%

0.40Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 70.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.