UAB logo

UAB

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.8%UAB
86.2%South Florida
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSouth Florida -12.8
PROJECTED TOTAL162.0
MODEL MONEYLINESouth Florida -625
South Florida logo

South Florida

25-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 75
Projected Total162.0
Projected ScoreSouth Florida 87

Team Comparison

56.9MMH Power Index68.8
110.5Offensive Efficiency117.3
102.9Defensive Efficiency101.6
7.6Net Efficiency15.7
0.4Strength of Schedule1.8
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency19.7
71.7Tempo74.5
48.8%Effective FG%51.0%
12.4%Turnover Rate14.9%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %38.0%
36.9%Free Throw Rate41.8%
5.4Average Margin11.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

South Florida HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSouth Florida holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.8–56.9), offensive efficiency (117.3–110.5), defensive efficiency (101.6–102.9), net efficiency (15.7–7.6).
UAB COUNTERS WITHball security (12.4–14.9).
Final
UAB logo
UAB
92—83
South Florida logo
South Florida
UAB by 9 • 67.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATSouth Florida
33-59FG32-59
56.0%FG%54.0%
8-133PT8-23
62.0%3PT%35.0%
18-25FT11-19
72.0%FT%58.0%
40Rebounds20
16Offensive Rebounds7
25Assists11
13Turnovers6
6Steals7
2Blocks5
14Fouls16

Player Box Score

UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Christian ColemanG339-110-03-693100021
Tony ToneyGuard327-104-60-020010018
Butta JohnsonG345-82-32-463000014
Yaxel LendeborgF345-120-11-356310011
Tyren MooreG171-41-18-834100011
Alejandro VasquezGuard154-51-12-242100011
Ja'Borri McGheeG222-60-10-02500004
Bradley EzewiroForward130-30-02-25200002
South Florida
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jayden ReidG338-164-86-614100026
Jamille ReynoldsForward286-110-11-450010013
Jimmie WilliamsG185-63-40-201100013
Brandon StroudGuard234-50-11-22010009
CJ BrownG224-60-01-32430009
Kasen JenningsG263-61-40-02110007
Kobe KnoxG222-40-12-25101006
Quincy AdemokoyaGuard170-40-40-00001000
De'Ante GreenF110-10-00-00002000

Advanced Game Stats

67.5Possessions67.5
136.3Offensive Efficiency123.0
123.0Defensive Efficiency136.3
13.3Net Efficiency-13.3
62.7%Effective FG%61.0%
64.9%True Shooting %61.0%
19.2%Turnover Rate9.0%
42.4%Free Throw Rate32.2%
22.0%3-Point Rate39.0%
1.92Assist / Turnover1.83
Game Summary
UAB won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 67.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.