
Duquesne
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.9%Duquesne
82.1%George Washington
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGeorge Washington -10.4
PROJECTED TOTAL157.6
MODEL MONEYLINEGeorge Washington -459

George Washington
19-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDuquesne 74
Projected Total157.6
Projected ScoreGeorge Washington 84
Team Comparison
50.7MMH Power Index59.8
110.6Offensive Efficiency115.4
106.2Defensive Efficiency105.2
4.4Net Efficiency10.2
0.6Strength of Schedule3.1
-5.9Last 10 Net Efficiency0.9
70.8Tempo70.5
53.4%Effective FG%55.0%
17.7%Turnover Rate18.2%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %35.8%
38.2%Free Throw Rate35.6%
3.1Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
George Washington HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGeorge Washington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–50.7), offensive efficiency (115.4–110.6), defensive efficiency (105.2–106.2), net efficiency (10.2–4.4).
Duquesne COUNTERS WITHball security (17.7–18.2), free throw rate (38.2–35.6).