Florida Atlantic

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

57.5%Florida Atlantic

42.5%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida Atlantic -2.2

PROJECTED TOTAL152.5

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida Atlantic -135

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida Atlantic 77

Projected Total152.5

Projected ScoreTulane 75

Team Comparison

Florida AtlanticMetricTulane

51.6MMH Power Index44.3

110.5Offensive Efficiency105.3

104.4Defensive Efficiency109.9

6.1Net Efficiency-4.6

-0.9Strength of Schedule2.7

-2.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

71.2Tempo68.7

52.5%Effective FG%49.6%

17.3%Turnover Rate15.6%

32.9%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

33.9%Free Throw Rate44.8%

4.3Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Florida Atlantic HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida Atlantic holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.6–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (104.4–109.9), net efficiency (6.1–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-0.9), ball security (15.6–17.3), free throw rate (44.8–33.9).

Final

Florida Atlantic

65—80

Tulane

Tulane by 15 • 68.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida AtlanticTEAM STATTulane

24-59FG25-54

41.0%FG%46.0%

6-263PT7-26

23.0%3PT%27.0%

11-19FT23-27

58.0%FT%85.0%

37Rebounds33

14Offensive Rebounds8

15Assists19

15Turnovers10

6Steals13

3Blocks1

21Fouls17

Player Box Score

Florida Atlantic

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kaleb Glenn	F	23	5-8	2-4	1-1	4	2	1	0	13
Tre Carroll	F	28	4-9	0-1	2-6	8	1	0	0	10
KyKy Tandy	Guard	25	3-11	1-8	1-2	2	1	1	0	8
Ken Evans Jr.	Guard	22	3-8	1-1	1-2	4	0	0	0	8
Matas Vokietaitis	C	15	3-3	0-0	2-2	3	0	0	1	8
Leland Walker	G	27	3-10	1-6	0-0	1	2	1	0	7
Baba Miller	F	32	1-5	0-2	2-4	6	5	0	1	4
Devin Vanterpool	G	5	1-2	0-1	2-2	0	0	0	1	4
Niccolo Moretti	G	23	1-3	1-3	0-0	3	4	3	0	3

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kaleb Banks	F	29	8-14	1-5	8-10	4	0	2	0	25
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	37	4-7	3-5	9-11	2	2	2	0	20
Asher Woods	G	30	5-10	2-5	4-4	5	1	2	0	16
Gregg Glenn III	F	31	3-8	1-4	0-0	8	11	2	0	7
Kam Williams	G	31	3-7	0-3	0-0	3	3	2	0	6
Mari Jordan	G	18	2-5	0-2	2-2	4	1	2	0	6
Tyler Ringgold	F	10	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	1	0
Percy Daniels	C	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
KJ Greene	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9

94.3Offensive Efficiency116.1

116.1Defensive Efficiency94.3

-21.8Net Efficiency21.8

45.8%Effective FG%52.8%

47.8%True Shooting %59.9%

21.7%Turnover Rate14.5%

32.2%Free Throw Rate50.0%

44.1%3-Point Rate48.1%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.90

Game Summary

Tulane won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.