Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.6%Lipscomb

54.4%Bellarmine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBellarmine -0.6

PROJECTED TOTAL159.8

MODEL MONEYLINEBellarmine -119

Bellarmine

13-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 80

Projected Total159.8

Projected ScoreBellarmine 80

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricBellarmine

47.9MMH Power Index44.9

111.3Offensive Efficiency119.6

107.6Defensive Efficiency122.1

3.7Net Efficiency-2.5

-2.5Strength of Schedule-2.8

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency0.3

68.8Tempo66.9

54.8%Effective FG%60.0%

16.0%Turnover Rate15.3%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %22.7%

26.5%Free Throw Rate35.3%

2.5Average Margin-1.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–44.9), defensive efficiency (107.6–122.1), net efficiency (3.7–-2.5), strength of schedule (-2.5–-2.8).

Bellarmine COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (119.6–111.3), recent form (0.3–-1.0), shooting efficiency (60.0–54.8).

Final

Lipscomb

87—53

Bellarmine

Lipscomb by 34 • 66.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATBellarmine

33-62FG18-54

53.0%FG%33.0%

15-353PT7-26

43.0%3PT%27.0%

6-10FT10-13

60.0%FT%77.0%

44Rebounds24

12Offensive Rebounds5

19Assists6

10Turnovers12

6Steals7

1Blocks—

14Fouls13

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Will Pruitt	Guard	28	9-12	4-7	2-4	7	1	0	0	24
Jacob Ognacevic	F	30	8-12	0-1	1-2	16	1	0	0	17
Grant Asman	F	24	4-4	3-3	0-0	4	3	0	1	11
Joe Anderson	Guard	26	4-9	2-6	0-0	4	5	3	0	10
Kellan Boylan	F	11	2-4	2-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Gyasi Powell	Guard	17	2-7	1-4	0-0	3	1	0	0	5
Charlie Williams	C	16	2-5	1-4	0-0	1	5	2	0	5
Logan Suber	G	14	1-3	1-3	1-2	2	1	0	0	4
Miles White	G	18	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	1	1	0	3
Ross Candelino	G	11	0-2	0-1	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
Luke Carter	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Zach Lamey	G	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jack Ingold	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Bellarmine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jack Karasinski	F	23	4-10	3-8	3-4	2	1	0	14
Myles Watkins	G	15	5-7	1-1	1-3	0	0	1	12
Landin Hacker	Guard	28	3-9	3-6	0-0	0	0	0	9
Kenyon Goodin	G	28	2-5	0-1	2-2	1	1	4	6
Dezmond McKinney	Guard	15	2-7	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	6
Tyler Doyle	G	23	2-5	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	4
Luke Anderson	F	5	0-0	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	2
Grant Whitaker	G	29	0-2	0-1	0-0	5	1	2	0
Curt Hopf	Forward	19	0-6	0-4	0-0	6	1	0	0
AJ Lux	Guard	15	0-3	0-3	0-0	7	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.0Possessions66.0

131.8Offensive Efficiency80.3

80.3Defensive Efficiency131.8

51.5Net Efficiency-51.5

65.3%Effective FG%39.8%

65.2%True Shooting %44.0%

15.4%Turnover Rate17.9%

16.1%Free Throw Rate24.1%

56.5%3-Point Rate48.1%

1.90Assist / Turnover0.50

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 34 points. The game played at approximately 66.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.