Queens University logo

Queens University

21-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.9%Queens University
31.1%Stetson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -4.2
PROJECTED TOTAL165.2
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -222
Stetson logo

Stetson

12-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 85
Projected Total165.2
Projected ScoreStetson 80

Team Comparison

51.7MMH Power Index40
118.4Offensive Efficiency107.2
117.0Defensive Efficiency115.9
1.4Net Efficiency-8.7
0.1Strength of Schedule-1.0
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.9
71.4Tempo68.7
56.6%Effective FG%53.8%
14.8%Turnover Rate18.3%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %28.1%
37.6%Free Throw Rate33.6%
0.9Average Margin-6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–40.0), offensive efficiency (118.4–107.2), net efficiency (1.4–-8.7), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.0).
Stetson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (115.9–117.0).
Final
Queens University logo
Queens University
95—60
Stetson logo
Stetson
Queens University by 35 • 73.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATStetson
35-70FG20-52
50.0%FG%38.0%
12-343PT3-16
35.0%3PT%19.0%
13-17FT17-23
76.0%FT%74.0%
47Rebounds26
17Offensive Rebounds5
25Assists5
11Turnovers16
12Steals5
5Blocks2
19Fouls14

Player Box Score

Queens University
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nasir MannG235-111-64-450300015
Kalib MathewsGuard276-60-01-181110013
Chris AshbyG254-104-90-001010012
Maban JabrielF223-100-64-771000010
Yoav BermanG153-62-42-230100010
Leo ColimerioForward203-81-32-37830009
Malcolm WilsonForward194-60-00-03013008
Asjon AndersonG52-21-10-02110005
Bryce CashGuard232-50-00-010720004
Jaxon PollardF131-21-10-01300003
DJ ShineGuard51-31-30-00300003
Aneek PatilGuard11-11-10-00000003
Jordon NevillGuard20-00-00-00000000
Stetson
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Mehki EllisonG316-131-36-632000019
Josh MasseyForward235-50-02-430000012
Stefano AlessoForward153-70-01-23001007
Jamie Phillips Jr.G251-61-23-41000006
Alex DoyleF162-51-40-01000005
Abramo CankaGuard162-40-11-23001005
Blaize SagnaG231-30-11-14210003
Finley SheridanF120-30-12-21000002
Jordan WoodForward210-40-31-23110001
Daniel MacgregorG130-10-00-00030000
Treyton ThompsonForward50-10-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

73.0Possessions73.0
130.1Offensive Efficiency82.2
82.2Defensive Efficiency130.1
47.9Net Efficiency-47.9
58.6%Effective FG%41.3%
60.8%True Shooting %47.7%
15.3%Turnover Rate21.6%
24.3%Free Throw Rate44.2%
48.6%3-Point Rate30.8%
2.27Assist / Turnover0.31
Game Summary
Queens University won by 35 points. The game played at approximately 73.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.