Clemson logo

Clemson

24-10
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
63.1%Clemson
36.9%Pittsburgh
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL138.5
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -171
Pittsburgh logo

Pittsburgh

13-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreClemson 71
Projected Total138.5
Projected ScorePittsburgh 68

Team Comparison

59.9MMH Power Index50.5
112.6Offensive Efficiency108.4
101.4Defensive Efficiency110.4
11.2Net Efficiency-2.0
4.6Strength of Schedule5.5
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9
63.6Tempo65.0
53.0%Effective FG%51.4%
14.0%Turnover Rate17.3%
27.0%Offensive Rebound %33.1%
38.1%Free Throw Rate31.2%
7.2Average Margin-1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–50.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–108.4), defensive efficiency (101.4–110.4), net efficiency (11.2–-2.0).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–4.6), offensive rebounding (33.1–27.0).
Final
Clemson logo
Clemson
78—75
Pittsburgh logo
Pittsburgh
Clemson by 3 • 62.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATPittsburgh
27-53FG28-62
51.0%FG%45.0%
14-273PT11-34
52.0%3PT%32.0%
10-14FT8-10
71.0%FT%80.0%
32Rebounds30
10Offensive Rebounds14
16Assists17
13Turnovers9
5Steals8
2Blocks4
12Fouls13

Player Box Score

Clemson
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chase HunterGuard436-115-93-452000020
Jaeden ZackeryNot Available415-112-54-553000016
Ian SchieffelinForward395-102-43-4113010015
Chauncey WigginsF345-81-40-010000011
Dillon HunterG334-72-30-116300010
Viktor LakhinCenter201-41-10-04021003
Jake HeidbrederG81-11-10-00200003
Myles FosterForward70-10-00-01000000
Pittsburgh
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ishmael LeggettGuard426-144-72-254210018
Jaland LoweG435-121-54-443100015
Cameron CorhenF297-70-01-231010015
Zack AustinForward424-132-100-073010010
Guillermo Diaz GrahamF343-73-71-255310010
Damian DunnNot Available243-91-50-03120007
Papa Amadou KanteF40-00-00-00000000
Jorge Diaz GrahamF40-00-00-00000000
Brandin CummingsG30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

62.3Possessions62.3
125.2Offensive Efficiency120.4
120.4Defensive Efficiency125.2
4.8Net Efficiency-4.8
64.2%Effective FG%54.0%
65.4%True Shooting %56.2%
20.8%Turnover Rate14.6%
26.4%Free Throw Rate16.1%
50.9%3-Point Rate54.8%
1.23Assist / Turnover1.89
Game Summary
Clemson won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 62.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.