Navy logo

Navy

26-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
86.3%Navy
13.7%Bucknell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -12.2
PROJECTED TOTAL141.2
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -630
Bucknell logo

Bucknell

10-23
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNavy 77
Projected Total141.2
Projected ScoreBucknell 65

Team Comparison

56.8MMH Power Index35.7
113.2Offensive Efficiency99.5
97.6Defensive Efficiency112.8
15.6Net Efficiency-13.3
-8.1Strength of Schedule2.0
16.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5
65.9Tempo67.7
53.7%Effective FG%48.4%
17.1%Turnover Rate19.0%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
40.9%Free Throw Rate30.7%
10.3Average Margin-8.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Navy HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–35.7), offensive efficiency (113.2–99.5), defensive efficiency (97.6–112.8), net efficiency (15.6–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-8.1).
Final
Navy logo
Navy
69—73
Bucknell logo
Bucknell
Bucknell by 4 • 65.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NavyTEAM STATBucknell
25-61FG23-48
41.0%FG%48.0%
7-193PT6-21
37.0%3PT%29.0%
12-16FT21-28
75.0%FT%75.0%
37Rebounds26
15Offensive Rebounds4
9Assists12
12Turnovers8
5Steals7
—Blocks3
19Fouls14

Player Box Score

Navy
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Austin BenigniG378-172-45-555200023
Jinwoo KimG304-82-23-410000013
Aidan KehoeC364-70-01-311020009
Donovan DraperF303-90-43-310210009
Jordan PennickG252-71-20-11100005
Cam ColeG141-61-30-01000003
Mike WoodsF101-31-20-05000003
Lysander RehnstromGuard71-10-00-00100002
Mitch FischerForward51-10-00-00000002
Carnegie JohnsonGuard60-20-20-00000000
Bucknell
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Noah WilliamsonC299-151-46-1281110025
Josh BascoeGuard376-114-62-247300018
Ruot BijiekF333-70-33-34000009
Achile SpadoneG361-50-26-64110008
Brandon McCreeshG311-41-32-23210005
Pip AjayiForward112-20-00-02012004
Jayden WilliamsG181-30-20-11100002
Brady MullerF50-10-12-20000002

Advanced Game Stats

65.4Possessions65.4
105.5Offensive Efficiency111.6
111.6Defensive Efficiency105.5
-6.1Net Efficiency6.1
46.7%Effective FG%54.2%
50.3%True Shooting %59.5%
18.3%Turnover Rate12.3%
26.2%Free Throw Rate58.3%
31.1%3-Point Rate43.8%
0.75Assist / Turnover1.50
Game Summary
Bucknell won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 65.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.